not logged in
| re: Everything Alright In The Critics Section? | |
Posted by:  |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 03:58 pm UTC 04/07/09 |
| In reply to: | Everything Alright In The Critics Section? - steven_stuart 10:39 pm UTC 04/04/09 |
Listen guy, surely you can understand people's reservations of the things you are saying(I myself don't believe you, you mentioned one of the actors playing hook. If this was reality JD would have pulled the comments at the producers request.) What fucks me of is that know one legit (And by that I mean JD and Jim) gives us any real information on ANYTHING! And if Jim wants to keep stum that's up to him. But some information on whether people like you are indeed telling the truth or lying before people start debunking to other boards should be obligatory . I'm not surprised Smeg gets angry with you, from his recent posts I think Jim's music has probably had the most effect on him then anyone else on the board. so when you come in and lie in the midst of a draught of news the reaction is of course going to be sour. > > I don't see Klasien or Rob encouraging Mr.Egg to offer up > > proof to shut us 'hypocritical cunts' up, instead they're > > encouraging the trolls to troll. > > My dear grumpy old Pudding, I think that they are talking > about Smeghead more than you. They are not encouraging > trolls to troll, they are showing that they are not afraid > to stand up to thugs. > > Also, it is Smeghead who is using the word "cunt", when he > mistakenly calls me a "lying cunt". > > The people you mention do not find it necessary to use > that kind of language. They merely pointed out that some > posters who go on about spam are hypocritical because they > frequently spam the board and behave like trolls. > > Like you with your frequent Susan posts. You have helped > make Susan the most famous person on the board and she > hasn't posted here for a long time. > > I have also posted about Susan and I probably shouldn't do > that. I have talked about our six month email relationship > because someone else made it public knowledge but I know > that I am guilty and I am sorry. > > However, I never complained about your posts until you had > a go at me, calling me a troll. > > I can't believe that you think you are innocent and that > you never ever try to stir things up. > > I can't believe that Smeghead is a Jim Henson fan. He > didn't learn that kind of language from watching the > Muppet Show. > > Smeghead refuses to believe anything I say. I have no idea > why. I do not want to insult him with the same kind of > obscene language that he has used to insult me. I will > merely say that he is being unfair. > > I did not want to bring up my relationship with the > producers of the musical but a letter from Susan, > detailing the history of the two producers who are closest > to me, was published during the Letter from Workington > thread. > > So when you asked me how I had read the script if it is > not online, I told you. I felt that the cat was already > out of the bag. > > I don't know why you asked me about the script. I feel you > forced me into a corner by asking me that. I probably > wouldn't have said anything about having read the script > if you hadn't asked me. > > For all you knew I could have been just comparing the > storyline for Jim's script with the review of the new > show storyline. > > Everyone knows the basic story. It is common knowledge and > featured in several books. > > A rock version of Peter Pan, set in post-apocalyptic New > York (Obsidian), which is ruled over by the evil police > chief Hook. > > Just that information would be enough to say that Jim's > story is better than the story of a homicidal maniac who > kills his victims with disco music and covers their bodies > in cornflakes, so that he can be a cereal killer. > > This is a West End production reviewed by the Times. > > What I was trying to say is that surely Jim's show will > succeed if it has not only great songs but a really good > storyline as well. > > Why you started saying about the script not being > available online, I really don't know. > > BTW, Smeghead very rudely said that I was "at the public > reading sitting in GOD's lap." > > Why is he not being a troll? Why is that not spam? > > I clearly explained that I was not at the reading. I saw > the DVDs of the reading and sent Jim a requested report > (as did many other people). I certainly wouldn't have been > sitting in GOD's lap if I had been there. > > Smeghead is allowed to be really rude and he feels that he > is doing nothing wrong. But someone else steps out of line > slightly and he calls for them to be banned. > > Smeghead wrote that "you've still offered no proof that > you know any producers or were sent scripts by Jim." I am > not sure what I can do to prove these things to dear > grumpy old Smeghead. > > His latest assault on me (including an accusation of being > a troll) came from a a post that I made in reply to a > Marvello post, when I read that he was a biker. > > I was asked to look out for anything about bikes on the > board because the producers are not sure if they should > make a deal with Harley Davidson or one of several > Japanese companies who have expressed interest. > > Marcello's reply to me contained very useful information > that I have passed on. > > I don't know why you and Smeghead get so upset about these > things. > > When the Whistle Down The Wind tour opened in the States, > several people published pictures of themselves with Jim. > I didn't get jealous and ask why can't I have my picture > taken with Jim? One day I hope to have that honour but > more power to the fans who have already got together with > him. > > It would be nice if we could all be friends. I will try to > stick to Jim things that do not involve the show from now > on. > > But if Smeghead disagrees with something I have said, he > shouldn't call me a "lying cunt". I mean how uncivilised > is that? He sounds like Porkington in a bad mood. Surely > he could just disagree in a polite way. > > I was really surprised when he said that. Especially since > I didn't really want to talk about my relationship with > the producers in the first place. Susan wrote about it for > me. I thought that I was sending her confidential emails > but she sent them all over the place. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Everything Alright In The Critics Section? - steven_stuart 10:39 pm UTC 04/04/09 |
| Next: | re: Everything Alright In The Critics Section? - steven_stuart 11:43 am UTC 04/08/09 |
| Thread: |
|