| re: Everything Alright In The Critics Section? | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 11:43 am UTC 04/08/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Everything Alright In The Critics Section? - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 03:58 pm UTC 04/07/09 |
| I didn't lie and I honestly don't want to fight with Smeg. > > Listen guy, surely you can understand people's > reservations of the things you are saying(I myself don't > believe you, you mentioned one of the actors playing > hook. If this was reality JD would have pulled the > comments at the producers request.) What fucks me of is > that know one legit (And by that I mean JD and Jim) gives > us any real information on ANYTHING! And if Jim wants to > keep stum that's up to him. But some information on > whether people like you are indeed telling the truth or > lying before people start debunking to other boards should > be obligatory . I'm not surprised Smeg gets angry with > you, from his recent posts I think Jim's music has > probably had the most effect on him then anyone else on > the board. so when you come in and lie in the midst of a > draught of news the reaction is of course going to be > sour. > > > I don't see Klasien or Rob encouraging Mr.Egg to offer up > > > proof to shut us 'hypocritical cunts' up, instead they're > > > encouraging the trolls to troll. > > > > My dear grumpy old Pudding, I think that they are talking > > about Smeghead more than you. They are not encouraging > > trolls to troll, they are showing that they are not afraid > > to stand up to thugs. > > > > Also, it is Smeghead who is using the word "cunt", when he > > mistakenly calls me a "lying cunt". > > > > The people you mention do not find it necessary to use > > that kind of language. They merely pointed out that some > > posters who go on about spam are hypocritical because they > > frequently spam the board and behave like trolls. > > > > Like you with your frequent Susan posts. You have helped > > make Susan the most famous person on the board and she > > hasn't posted here for a long time. > > > > I have also posted about Susan and I probably shouldn't do > > that. I have talked about our six month email relationship > > because someone else made it public knowledge but I know > > that I am guilty and I am sorry. > > > > However, I never complained about your posts until you had > > a go at me, calling me a troll. > > > > I can't believe that you think you are innocent and that > > you never ever try to stir things up. > > > > I can't believe that Smeghead is a Jim Henson fan. He > > didn't learn that kind of language from watching the > > Muppet Show. > > > > Smeghead refuses to believe anything I say. I have no idea > > why. I do not want to insult him with the same kind of > > obscene language that he has used to insult me. I will > > merely say that he is being unfair. > > > > I did not want to bring up my relationship with the > > producers of the musical but a letter from Susan, > > detailing the history of the two producers who are closest > > to me, was published during the Letter from Workington > > thread. > > > > So when you asked me how I had read the script if it is > > not online, I told you. I felt that the cat was already > > out of the bag. > > > > I don't know why you asked me about the script. I feel you > > forced me into a corner by asking me that. I probably > > wouldn't have said anything about having read the script > > if you hadn't asked me. > > > > For all you knew I could have been just comparing the > > storyline for Jim's script with the review of the new > > show storyline. > > > > Everyone knows the basic story. It is common knowledge and > > featured in several books. > > > > A rock version of Peter Pan, set in post-apocalyptic New > > York (Obsidian), which is ruled over by the evil police > > chief Hook. > > > > Just that information would be enough to say that Jim's > > story is better than the story of a homicidal maniac who > > kills his victims with disco music and covers their bodies > > in cornflakes, so that he can be a cereal killer. > > > > This is a West End production reviewed by the Times. > > > > What I was trying to say is that surely Jim's show will > > succeed if it has not only great songs but a really good > > storyline as well. > > > > Why you started saying about the script not being > > available online, I really don't know. > > > > BTW, Smeghead very rudely said that I was "at the public > > reading sitting in GOD's lap." > > > > Why is he not being a troll? Why is that not spam? > > > > I clearly explained that I was not at the reading. I saw > > the DVDs of the reading and sent Jim a requested report > > (as did many other people). I certainly wouldn't have been > > sitting in GOD's lap if I had been there. > > > > Smeghead is allowed to be really rude and he feels that he > > is doing nothing wrong. But someone else steps out of line > > slightly and he calls for them to be banned. > > > > Smeghead wrote that "you've still offered no proof that > > you know any producers or were sent scripts by Jim." I am > > not sure what I can do to prove these things to dear > > grumpy old Smeghead. > > > > His latest assault on me (including an accusation of being > > a troll) came from a a post that I made in reply to a > > Marvello post, when I read that he was a biker. > > > > I was asked to look out for anything about bikes on the > > board because the producers are not sure if they should > > make a deal with Harley Davidson or one of several > > Japanese companies who have expressed interest. > > > > Marcello's reply to me contained very useful information > > that I have passed on. > > > > I don't know why you and Smeghead get so upset about these > > things. > > > > When the Whistle Down The Wind tour opened in the States, > > several people published pictures of themselves with Jim. > > I didn't get jealous and ask why can't I have my picture > > taken with Jim? One day I hope to have that honour but > > more power to the fans who have already got together with > > him. > > > > It would be nice if we could all be friends. I will try to > > stick to Jim things that do not involve the show from now > > on. > > > > But if Smeghead disagrees with something I have said, he > > shouldn't call me a "lying cunt". I mean how uncivilised > > is that? He sounds like Porkington in a bad mood. Surely > > he could just disagree in a polite way. > > > > I was really surprised when he said that. Especially since > > I didn't really want to talk about my relationship with > > the producers in the first place. Susan wrote about it for > > me. I thought that I was sending her confidential emails > > but she sent them all over the place. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Everything Alright In The Critics Section? - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 03:58 pm UTC 04/07/09 |
| Next: | re: Everything Alright In The Critics Section? - LordRahl 02:47 am UTC 04/05/09 |
| Thread: | |