| re: Celine Dion |
|
Posted by:
 |
daveake 09:17 pm UTC 04/10/09 |
| In reply to: |
re: Celine Dion - steven_stuart 09:12 pm UTC 04/10/09 |
|
> But I think you were wrong that people are not being
> negative about Celine. What about the poor woman who has
> been branded a silly cow by her husband because she
> prefers Celine's version?
It's not being "negative to Celine" to say that the PB version is much better, or that someone who listens to both but prefers Celine's version is nuts or needs to get their ears syringed. Something like "Celine is a crap singer" would be negative.
> But most people out there either preffered the Celine
> version or have never heard the Pandora's Box version.
The latter. And?
> The point is that she has given Jim an international hit
> to add to his impressive collection and she has drawn
> attention to Jim's music amongst a crowd that may not have
> experienced Steinman magic before.
And this makes it wrong to state that her "Cardboard Box" version is vastly inferior to the Pandora's Box version?
Dave
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Celine Dion - Pudding 11:53 pm UTC 04/10/09 |
| Next: |
Air Supply - steven_stuart 12:30 pm UTC 04/11/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|