| re: Obama's first 100 Days | |
|
Posted by: |
Leesa 03:24 am UTC 04/30/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Obama's first 100 Days - The_Count 03:10 am UTC 04/30/09 |
| Yeah, BUT we're still moving in a better more sensible direction. No politician is ever completely clean--it's the irony about being a good one. But be a smart, open-minded, far-sighted person with at least a smattering of integrity, a sense of priorities, the ability to play well with others, (not seducing pages or hanging out in airport bathrooms and having it all over the news), and a ton of charisma to sell it, and things that need to get done might actually happen. And hopefully we'll see a decent economy similar to what we had 9 years ago before Bush drove it off the rails. Of course they all lie and orchestrate to a point--but it was the blatent outrageousness of the former administration that assumed we were all idiots and they were above the law that was so galling and embarrassing after a while. This disinfranchisement of so many people was truly a sad day for the US. That is one aspect that seems over for the time. A 3rd party wouldn't be a bad idea, but don't expect miracles from that either when it comes to politics--they're all the same animal, like it or not. Cheers! Leesa J > Were that it were true, Leesa but all we have is a > different idiots spewing different lies. I am hoping a > Genuine new third party emerges from the catasrophe we > have in Washington. I'd name it the Sentient party and > would bar anyone with an IQ lower than their shoe size. > Granted, it would be a small party...:>) > > > I think it's a collective shock from not hearing stupid > > crap and lies come out of a president's mouth after 8 > > years. The administration's not going to turn everything > > around for some time, but at least we're not going down > > the path McCain and Palin would have drove us under with. > > It's nice not to have idiots and liars in charge for a > > change. > > Cheers! > > Leesa J > > > > > Is it just me or does anyone else think that the news > > > media (CNN, FoxNews etc etc) has a 'touch of the downs' by > > > creaming their pants over Obama's first 100 days in > > > office. Wolf Blitzer needs to get himself a couple of good > > > porn movies (Jacqui Smith's husband could probably > > > recommend a couple) instead of salivating on CNN. > > > > > > It takes longer than 100 days to brew some decent beer, > > > fixing the economy, Iraq, Afghanistan, healthcare, > > > unemployment and all the other shit piled on top that will > > > take a bit longer I'm sure. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Obama's first 100 Days - The_Count 03:10 am UTC 04/30/09 |
| Next: | re: Obama's first 100 Days - junior 03:58 am UTC 04/30/09 |
| Thread: |
|