| re: Obama's first 100 Days | |
|
Posted by: |
John_Galt (brandonmartin@dailyuprising.com) 01:35 am UTC 05/01/09 |
| In reply to: | Obama's first 100 Days - Pudding 11:18 pm UTC 04/29/09 |
| Pud, I agree that the coverage has been annoying across the board. Obama's first 100 days have been significant, though. Obama has spent more in his first 100 days than George W. Bush and the Republican congress did in the entirety of Bush's first term! He has delivered on change even if the results aren't there. His best move was relaxing mark-to-market value accounting rules. This has had a greater effect of easing the credit crunch than his entire stimulus bill. BTW, in the circles I run in, Prime Minister John Key and his approach to economic stimulus are increasingly popular. -=John Galt=- > Is it just me or does anyone else think that the news > media (CNN, FoxNews etc etc) has a 'touch of the downs' by > creaming their pants over Obama's first 100 days in > office. Wolf Blitzer needs to get himself a couple of good > porn movies (Jacqui Smith's husband could probably > recommend a couple) instead of salivating on CNN. > > It takes longer than 100 days to brew some decent beer, > fixing the economy, Iraq, Afghanistan, healthcare, > unemployment and all the other shit piled on top that will > take a bit longer I'm sure. | |
| URL: | http://www.dailyuprising.com |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Obama's first 100 Days - Pudding 11:18 pm UTC 04/29/09 |
| Next: | re: Obama's first 100 Days - Pudding 04:27 am UTC 05/01/09 |
| Thread: |
|