| re: Separating the Meat from the chaff | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 04:48 pm UTC 07/10/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Separating the Meat from the chaff - Smeghead 04:14 pm UTC 07/10/09 |
| > Jim should have nothing to do with Meat... if Meat > couldn't have a hit with the Bat Out Of Hell title what > chance has he got at a hit without it.... and since he > can't sing any longer why would Jim want to waste anything > on a has been? The newly repackaged Hits Out Of Hell is back in the UK album charts, so he can't be a complete "has been", although it is no thanks to any song not written by Jim. I agree that he shouldn't "waste" anymore songs on Meat. Any unreleased Jim compositions are precious these days and he needs them to escape from the long shadow that Meat has cast over Jim's carear (especially in the UK). Having said that, Meat should always get some credit for being the first performer to send Jim's compositions into orbit. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Separating the Meat from the chaff - Infinite_Victims 05:16 pm UTC 07/10/09 |
| Next: | re: Separating the Meat from the chaff - Smeghead 06:48 pm UTC 07/10/09 |
| Thread: |
|