| re: Separating the Meat from the chaff | |
|
Posted by: |
Vin 03:53 am UTC 07/11/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Separating the Meat from the chaff - Smeghead 04:14 pm UTC 07/10/09 |
| The Bat Out of Hell title didn't sell the first record. The songs did. The title certainly played a role in the success of Bat II, but I would suggest about 50% of that album's success is due to the lead single, IDAFL. After the records that followed Bat II and the loss of the curiosity factor, the Bat title won't sell many records anymore; that's been proven. Meat *can* sing well enough, in the studio. He just needs a good single. Or two. Bat III did not have that, and shame on everybody involved for not knowing it. > Jim should have nothing to do with Meat... if Meat > couldn't have a hit with the Bat Out Of Hell title what > chance has he got at a hit without it.... and since he > can't sing any longer why would Jim want to waste anything > on a has been? > > > I think it's good that they are discarding songs. Less > > chance of another CHSIB that way. Hopefully Meat will find > > about 8 minutes to fill and do a cover of Making Love Out > > Of Nothing At All. More chance of me losing my anal > > virginity but I can hope! | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Separating the Meat from the chaff - Smeghead 04:14 pm UTC 07/10/09 |
| Next: | re: Separating the Meat from the chaff - Infinite_Victims 05:16 pm UTC 07/10/09 |
| Thread: | |