| Give Wordnix A Chance | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 12:37 am UTC 08/02/09 |
| I have noticed that on this page of messages alone, Pudding has refered to three people as "daft cunts". I already knew that he considered me to be a daft cunt but he has now labeled Conas and Wordnix with the same name. Conas is apparently a daft cunt for providing board members with a link to a blog written by Wordnix. I really have to disagree with Pudding because I believe that Conas was posting the link as a favour to those of us who like Wordnix and don't like the fact that he is in exile. As Susan has proved, a blog is a way for people in exile to keep in touch with the board. I hope that Wordnix continues to publish blogs until his unfair banishment has ended. And I can see nothing wrong with Conas posting links or even messages from Wordnix. Neither of them are daft cunts. If someone could explain to me what terrible thing Wordnix did, then perhaps I could understand why Pudding and Smeghead have found it necessary to bully him, when he was on the board and still while he is in exile. For example, why call him Gibson Wacko, when that is not his name? I feel that some posters have discriminated against Wordnix because he is homosexual. It's a great shame that there is still homophobia in this day and age. I would guess that certain posters will be voting for Sarah Palin if she runs for the White House. Wordnix was always very kind to me and that's what's important. Not his sexuality. I get similar treatment myself. The other day Rob complimented me because he thought that some of my posts were funny. Pudding took a chain yanking phrase out of context and he continues to repeat it. He ignored the fact that Rob said he didn't find Pudding's mate Mr. Smeg's humour to be funny. I was glad to see Wordnix thanking posters like Klasien for supporting him. I have also recieved support from Klasien and others like the wonderful Lord Rahl. If you listened to Dave, Pudding and Smeghead, you would think that every board member hated my posts but that is simply not true. Some members hate my posts. Some members hated posts that Wordnix posted. There are those who are critical of Conas and Ryan. But we are supposed to be an uncensored mirror of people who have been touched by Jim's words and music. That should mean many different types of posts from many different types of people being tolerated. I really believe that Wordnix should be given another chance. Conas has been banned five times. I have been banned three times. Smeghead has been banned once. Surely we could all find it in our hearts to welcome Wordnix back. But this time let us not bully him just because we disagree with something that he says. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Hi Jim! Hi RR! - daveake 02:21 pm UTC 08/02/09 |
| Next: | re: Give Wordnix A Chance - Conas 10:38 pm UTC 08/02/09 |
| Thread: |
|