| re: Give Wordnix A Chance | |
|
Posted by: |
Conas 10:38 pm UTC 08/02/09 |
| In reply to: | Give Wordnix A Chance - steven_stuart 12:37 am UTC 08/02/09 |
| If Wordnix/Gibson behaves himself he'll get back on in time. I know this may seem strange but you remind me of Ryan. Your posts and writing style's are very very similar. Hmmmmm > I have noticed that on this page of messages alone, > Pudding has refered to three people as "daft cunts". I > already knew that he considered me to be a daft cunt but > he has now labeled Conas and Wordnix with the same name. > > Conas is apparently a daft cunt for providing board > members with a link to a blog written by Wordnix. I really > have to disagree with Pudding because I believe that Conas > was posting the link as a favour to those of us who like > Wordnix and don't like the fact that he is in exile. As > Susan has proved, a blog is a way for people in exile to > keep in touch with the board. > > I hope that Wordnix continues to publish blogs until his > unfair banishment has ended. And I can see nothing wrong > with Conas posting links or even messages from Wordnix. > Neither of them are daft cunts. > > If someone could explain to me what terrible thing Wordnix > did, then perhaps I could understand why Pudding and > Smeghead have found it necessary to bully him, when he was > on the board and still while he is in exile. For example, > why call him Gibson Wacko, when that is not his name? > > I feel that some posters have discriminated against > Wordnix because he is homosexual. It's a great shame that > there is still homophobia in this day and age. I would > guess that certain posters will be voting for Sarah Palin > if she runs for the White House. Wordnix was always very > kind to me and that's what's important. Not his > sexuality. > > I get similar treatment myself. The other day Rob > complimented me because he thought that some of my posts > were funny. Pudding took a chain yanking phrase out of > context and he continues to repeat it. He ignored the fact > that Rob said he didn't find Pudding's mate Mr. Smeg's > humour to be funny. > > I was glad to see Wordnix thanking posters like Klasien > for supporting him. I have also recieved support from > Klasien and others like the wonderful Lord Rahl. If you > listened to Dave, Pudding and Smeghead, you would think > that every board member hated my posts but that is simply > not true. > > Some members hate my posts. Some members hated posts that > Wordnix posted. There are those who are critical of Conas > and Ryan. But we are supposed to be an uncensored mirror > of people who have been touched by Jim's words and music. > That should mean many different types of posts from many > different types of people being tolerated. > > I really believe that Wordnix should be given another > chance. Conas has been banned five times. I have been > banned three times. Smeghead has been banned once. Surely > we could all find it in our hearts to welcome Wordnix > back. > But this time let us not bully him just because we > disagree with something that he says. > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Give Wordnix A Chance - steven_stuart 12:37 am UTC 08/02/09 |
| Next: | re: Give Wordnix A Chance - steven_stuart 10:52 pm UTC 08/02/09 |
| Thread: |
|