| re: Polanski arrested | |
|
Posted by: |
Klasien 08:45 am UTC 09/29/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Polanski arrested - Pudding 07:54 pm UTC 09/28/09 |
| Why is it that every time you agree with me, I get scared?? Lol lol Anyway... maybe we should honour their wishes and drop the subject?? lol K. > > But anyway... he admitted to having sex with a minor... > > and the minor admitted to wanting it herself... and though > > she cannot legally consent... she didn't play hard to get, > > forgave him and asked for the whole case to be dropped > > several times now... > > > > As far as I am concerned... a paedophile is something > > worse and far more disgusting than a man who falls for the > > wrong chick... > > > > K. > > Agreed. Seems like the girl (now woman) at the centre of > this has no opinion whatsoever, at what point did she not > matter?. Surely she just wants to get on with her life now > but can't, yet has asked several times as you rightly > pointed out for the whole case to be dropped. > > As for Marvello shouting peadophile. The irony of the fact > that the Swiss supply 'guards' to protect the head of the > Catholic Church, which is in fact the biggest paedophile > ring in the world. Ratzinger himself re-affirmed the > “Crimine solicitationies” which states complete secrecy > for any scandal involving abuses of any kind. > > Surely the Pope should face criminal charges before > Polanski, as Polanski only fucked one kid, the Catholic > Church fucks many. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Polanski arrested - Pudding 07:54 pm UTC 09/28/09 |
| Next: | re: Polanski arrested - Marvello 02:01 pm UTC 09/29/09 |
| Thread: |
|