not logged in
| re: Free the man | |
Posted by:  |
Marvello 03:05 pm UTC 09/30/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Free the man - Dr_Rock 08:35 am UTC 09/30/09 |
| I also seem to remember a civil case where , he admitted said crime and a compensation/damages payout was made to the girl. Surely that was a further admission of guilt. Sick fucker, lock him away, throw away the key. > You obviously haven't followed it that closely or you > would know most of what you said was bollocks. Read the > transcript of the girl's testimony at the trial (see > link). OK she should never have got herself in that > situation and her Mother obviously had little interest in > her daughter's safety but having a shit parent doesn't > mean that if you're raped it doesn't count. I think this > is a good example of how no matter how mature a 13 year > old girl may think they are, they're nowhere near as > mature as they think and situations can quickly escalate > beyond what they could've expected or can handle. > From the evidence she gave in court we see she said "No" > countless times, admits to having had sex twice before > (hardly "numerous"), didn't know the proper name for > cunnilingus (which a sexually experienced person would > probably know), and had taken drugs once (accidentally > when, as a child, she found one of her Mother's 'ludes). > > I half get your point about labelling Polanski though. > However. > Polanski is a rapist. He was found guilty of rape by a > court, but paedophile and coward are probably > inaccurate,as who wouldn't run away if they thought they > were going to go to prison but knew they had a chance to > avoid it. > > > > People love throwing words like "rapist" "paedophile" and > > "coward" around when ever his name is mentioned, don't > > they. > > Of those, I find "coward" to be the most inaccurate. He > > most certainly isn't a coward. > > > > Of course what he did was unlawful, he pleaded guilty to > > that. At least he never denied it, like so many public > > figures who get caught with their pants down. > > One thing that annoys me is when folk act like his > > "victim" was pure innocence in the clutches of some crazed > > sex-beast! The girl was already sexually experienced and > > had had numerous adult lovers. Why were those guys never > > punished? The drugs and alcohol were nothing new to her > > either. > > They weren't even alone in the house when it happened - if > > he was being such a fiend, she could've given it the old > > Penelope Pitstop routine. No? > > > > All that doesn't change the fact that what happened was > > unlawful, I know. And I don't think what happened that > > afternoon was good in anyway. But I honestly feel that he > > doesn't deserve to be labelled with the kind of words that > > I mentioned at the start. > > > > That's about all I have to say on the issue really. The > > whole case is extremely boring, seeing as how it's been > > discussed to death over the years. > > > > > > > > > Yeah the poor little rapist, they are so mean to him. > > > Sure is sickening. Any 40 some year old man that gives > > > drgs and alcohol to a 13 year old girl should be granted > > > sainthood. The girl and her parents are of course at fault > > > since Polanski is an arteest. His fleeing shows us how > > > proud he is of his actions, definitely no coward that > > > guy. > > > > > > > After all the crap that he's had to put up with in his > > > > life, it borders on some kind of miracle that he didn't > > > > lose all hope in the world ages ago. Sickening how these > > > > bastards continue to hound him. > > > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Free the man - Belowzer0 04:09 pm UTC 09/30/09 |
| Next: | re: Free the man - Pudding 10:21 pm UTC 09/27/09 |
| Thread: | |