not logged in
| re: Free the man | |
Posted by:  |
Dr_Rock 08:35 am UTC 09/30/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Free the man - Belowzer0 11:58 pm UTC 09/29/09 |
| You obviously haven't followed it that closely or you would know most of what you said was bollocks. Read the transcript of the girl's testimony at the trial (see link). OK she should never have got herself in that situation and her Mother obviously had little interest in her daughter's safety but having a shit parent doesn't mean that if you're raped it doesn't count. I think this is a good example of how no matter how mature a 13 year old girl may think they are, they're nowhere near as mature as they think and situations can quickly escalate beyond what they could've expected or can handle. From the evidence she gave in court we see she said "No" countless times, admits to having had sex twice before (hardly "numerous"), didn't know the proper name for cunnilingus (which a sexually experienced person would probably know), and had taken drugs once (accidentally when, as a child, she found one of her Mother's 'ludes). I half get your point about labelling Polanski though. However. Polanski is a rapist. He was found guilty of rape by a court, but paedophile and coward are probably inaccurate,as who wouldn't run away if they thought they were going to go to prison but knew they had a chance to avoid it. > People love throwing words like "rapist" "paedophile" and > "coward" around when ever his name is mentioned, don't > they. > Of those, I find "coward" to be the most inaccurate. He > most certainly isn't a coward. > > Of course what he did was unlawful, he pleaded guilty to > that. At least he never denied it, like so many public > figures who get caught with their pants down. > One thing that annoys me is when folk act like his > "victim" was pure innocence in the clutches of some crazed > sex-beast! The girl was already sexually experienced and > had had numerous adult lovers. Why were those guys never > punished? The drugs and alcohol were nothing new to her > either. > They weren't even alone in the house when it happened - if > he was being such a fiend, she could've given it the old > Penelope Pitstop routine. No? > > All that doesn't change the fact that what happened was > unlawful, I know. And I don't think what happened that > afternoon was good in anyway. But I honestly feel that he > doesn't deserve to be labelled with the kind of words that > I mentioned at the start. > > That's about all I have to say on the issue really. The > whole case is extremely boring, seeing as how it's been > discussed to death over the years. > > > > > Yeah the poor little rapist, they are so mean to him. > > Sure is sickening. Any 40 some year old man that gives > > drgs and alcohol to a 13 year old girl should be granted > > sainthood. The girl and her parents are of course at fault > > since Polanski is an arteest. His fleeing shows us how > > proud he is of his actions, definitely no coward that > > guy. > > > > > After all the crap that he's had to put up with in his > > > life, it borders on some kind of miracle that he didn't > > > lose all hope in the world ages ago. Sickening how these > > > bastards continue to hound him. > > > > > | |
| URL: | Polanski the Predator? |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Free the man - Belowzer0 11:58 pm UTC 09/29/09 |
| Next: | re: Free the man - Pudding 10:39 pm UTC 09/30/09 |
| Thread: |
|