| re: Polanski Is Not Exactly Innocent |
|
Posted by:
 |
Dr_Rock 08:58 am UTC 10/01/09 |
| In reply to: |
Polanski Is Not Exactly Innocent - steven_stuart 04:56 pm UTC 09/30/09 |
|
It's not just Tanz. Polanski has directed many excellent films, and is undoubtedly a brilliant filmmaker. However I'm struggling to think of a situation where a 44 year old man raping and sodomising a 13 year old girl isn't sick in the extreme.
I think most of the jokes about Michael Jackson were simply cos he was an easy target and, alleged kiddy-fiddling aside, he was pretty fucking strange anyway.
> Are Jim fans more likely to forgive or support Polanski
> because he directed Tanz? I am not sure.
>
> I don't know what my opinion is. I hear powerful
> arguements from both sides. Perhaps both Polanski and the
> mother of the girl deserve to be punished.
>
> I wouldn't be very happy if he had sex with my fourteen
> year old daughter. I would hope that other posters with
> young daughters would agree.
>
> What would Mr. Smeg do if his newly born daughter had a
> sexual encounter with a middle aged man in only thirteen
> years time? After he had got her drunk?
>
> I read a very interesting autobiography called "Roman by
> Polanski" in the early eighties. I highly recommend it. He
> is actually very honest about what happened.
>
> I still don't understand why Michael Jackson is condemed
> on this board when he was found not guilty and Roman is
> supported when he admits everything.
>
> Is it a homophobic thing? Or is it because Michael didn't
> work with Jim? Even though they are both Peter Pans,
> people said the most horrible things when Michael died.
>
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
Polanski Is Not Exactly Innocent - steven_stuart 04:56 pm UTC 09/30/09 |
| Next: |
re: Polanski Is Not Exactly Innocent - Infinite_Victims 05:02 pm UTC 09/30/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|