| re: Batman the musical ... Cartoon | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 04:43 pm UTC 10/05/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Batman the musical ... Cartoon - Conas 10:38 pm UTC 10/04/09 |
| The Batman project meant something to Jim. It would have been so great if it had worked out, with Tim Burton directing. It certainly wasn't Jim's fault that it didn't happen. Other people screwed up DOTV and the Batman producers got cold feet. It's fun imagining what it might have been like. Plus I think Batman inspired Jim to write a few new songs. As usual, your attitude is immature and slightly vile. Jim did a lot for Batman. The producers ruined it all. Just as Tim Burton was coming on board. I can assure you that Tim wouldn't even consider doing a live show with any other composer. You should spend more time on the Meat Loaf board if you are going to be so disrespectful. > Why should there be any Jim references for fucksake...just > cause they mention Batman it doesn't mean Jim needs to be > mentioned. Batman the musical never came alive.. so Batman > has fuck all to do with Jim. I'm sick of all this crap > about Batman and Jim...what did Jim ever do for Batman? > Fucking nothing. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Batman the musical ... Cartoon - Conas 10:38 pm UTC 10/04/09 |
| Next: | re: Batman the musical ... Cartoon - Smeghead 05:00 pm UTC 10/05/09 |
| Thread: |
|