| re: For what it's worth... | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 04:02 pm UTC 10/10/09 |
| In reply to: | For what it's worth... - Scaramouche 01:18 pm UTC 10/10/09 |
| Thanks Scaramouche. I am really glad that you are posting on this board. > For what it's worth I don't have a problem with what you > post (there's been far worse on Rockman), and I think some > people here are a bit too sensitive (although that's their > prerogative). > > IF you do have 'big juicy bits' about the show then you > are being pretty well restrained, as I don't think you > have given out anything (that Jim hadn't already blogged > about), apart from Gerald Scarfe may no longer be > involved. > > But then so what? I was looking forward to what Scarfe > came up with but if Jim and/or the producers have moved on > to another designer then okay, we can look forward to > something from a different angle. > > The only other 'info' that has 'leaked' in the last 12 > months or so is two rejected logos/posters, so I would say > the producers are doing a good job of keeping everything > 'under their hats', and Jim from blogging (vee have ways > of making you NOT talk!). > > > BTW - Talking of info being released, wasn't the 'Love > Never Dies' press launch a bit of a damp squib? They had > about a two month twitter lead-in and then it all seemed a > bit of a rush job. > > ALW did his usual ramble but gave very little away (that > wasn't already known). No Glenn Salter or Jack O'Brien. No > Q & A. No songlist. > > I also thought that the two leads (as they were present) > could have performed live a couple of songs, instead of a > (bland) video. > > Perhaps they will have something else nearer the first > night, but it seemed a wasted opportunity? > > > > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | For what it's worth... - Scaramouche 01:18 pm UTC 10/10/09 |
| Next: | Hold on a mo'...just checking..... - Rob 12:49 pm UTC 10/10/09 |
| Thread: | |