> Look, it's real simple. In fact it's what I said earlier
> (I guess you missed it). "IMO" is needed when it's not
> OBVIOUS that it's an opinion. It's obvious to a blind bat
> that what Pudding said was an opinion. It would be
> obvious to a post-op brain donor. Shit, it was even
> obvious to you!
>
> Dave
Well, yes, basically what I'm now saying is that anything that gets said here is someone's opinion. Still, Pudding seemed to push that it was a sort of fact. I didn't like that.
I think Pudding's a valuable member of the community, with an excellent blog that should be promoted on all Steinman-related sites etc. But I do think his weakness sometimes is to assert things as meaning they are more than his opinion.
But we all have our weaknesses. My weakness is my tendency to over-react. Please, no one respond with any smart-allecky comments to this last paragraph...
|
