| re: Jim Steinman Collections |
|
Posted by:
 |
rockfenris2005 03:55 pm UTC 11/30/09 |
| In reply to: |
re: Jim Steinman Collections - steven_stuart 03:48 pm UTC 11/30/09 |
|
>
> Do you think that Bat 2 is even better than Bat 1? Or are
> they both so good that its not possible to say that one is
> better than the other?
I’ll be honest. I think it’s better than Bat 1 in some ways. Bat 1 is great and all but Jim didn’t have the resources available to him to truly realize his vision. I’m not saying this is fact or anything, just my opinion, but I believe if Meat and Jim had the kind of support and technology available to them that they had on Bat 2, Bat 1 would have been an even greater album.
Bat 2 is like an amazing journey in listening that you can’t describe. I still can’t quite categorize into anything else I've heard. Bat 1 is raw though and that has its charm. Again, this is another reason why I’m so looking forward to the musical, to see what Jim can do with the Bat 1 material without any of the constraints he had in 1977.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Jim Steinman Collections - Evil_One 04:20 pm UTC 11/30/09 |
| Next: |
re: Jim Steinman Collections - Rob 05:09 pm UTC 12/01/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|