| Dave Are You Capable Of Fairness? | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 02:22 am UTC 12/29/09 |
| In reply to: | re: A Promise Not To Behave In A Nasty Fashion - daveake 08:15 am UTC 12/26/09 |
| > You are allowed to talk about "Dave's place" here, and > it's an opportunity you obviously relish and take > advantage of frequently. That's not true. I haven't mentioned your place for weeks (even though there have been people saying awful things about me and pretending to be me to wind others up). If I had, I think you would have said something about it recently. Gosh. I heard very different information about your attitude recently. Apparently you admitted there was a problem with hate posts on your board and that you should have fixed the problem sooner. I'll have to check on this. > You lost your chance of affecting "Dave's place" within > hours of joining it, when 3 out of 4 of your posts were > deliberately made to wind up other posters, and as a > consequence got yourself banned. Oh come off it Dave. Are you capable of fairness? One post was to Evilnickname because he had recieved a Twitter message from AWOglanby and I was telling him that it wasn't me. One was to Pudding who had written that Andrew Oglanby was a useless son of a bitch (or something along those lines). One was to Wordnix because he was being very critical. And yet you see none of these posts as deliberate attempts to wind me up. > Your ban was then made > permanent when it was noticed that you'd supplied a fake > email address. I wasn't going to use a real email address when Pudding has admin access. I didn't even try to post again, so I wasn't aware that I had been banned. I have just lurked. I honestly don't want to affect your board. > Maybe, just maybe, you'll stop talking shit here. I could say the same to you. I am not talking shit here. You know the kind of hate messages that have been posted over at your place. And yet you have picked up on the few posts which were in reaction to those posts. I think you were talking shit when you accused me of being rude for posting Caveman's comments here (even though you say that I am allowed to talk about Dave's place). The fact is that you made everyone aware of the fact that I am Elva's son by posting a large section of Susan's blog on this board. > No > doubt you got some nice new toys for Xmas, but there's no > need to throw all of them out of your pram. I try to get on with you because we both post here and despite what Evil One says, I do believe in harmony. But you don't make it easy with comments like that. It is possible that you blame me for Pudding and Smeghead being banned. I don't know. I brought your place up because I was saying that they are allowed to be hateful over there and there was some suggestion that they might be coming back to Rockman. I was merely trying to argue that they could get the hate out of their systems over there (where they actaully break the law) and be more civilized over here (so that people like Shallah and Ryan, who are good posters and who have been bullied by those two, don't have to feel reluctant to post). I must also remind you that when I did mention Dave's place quite a few times (more than two weeks ago), it was because you and I got into a back and forth arguement that you were partly responsible for. I would have probably mentioned Dave's place only a few times if it was not for the arguement. I think it started off with an interest in Caveman which I talked about here because I wondered if anyone on Rockman knew who he was. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: A Promise Not To Behave In A Nasty Fashion - daveake 08:15 am UTC 12/26/09 |
| Next: | Bye bye - daveake 09:20 am UTC 12/29/09 |
| Thread: |
|