| re: Can Meat Loaf Really Be NJC? |
|
Posted by:
|
steven_stuart 10:46 pm UTC 02/06/10 |
| In reply to: |
re: Can Meat Loaf Really Be NJC? - Klasien 01:48 pm UTC 02/05/10 |
|
Fair enough. Well argued.
> Yes, he can... he's done loads of stuff without Jim, and
> it would appear that, besides Bat I and II, Meat is
> totally NJC these days...
>
> And the fact that Meat mentions Jim in his biography is no
> more than logical... There would be no Meat as we know him
> without Jim...
>
> Now I am not trying to open up the ancient and most
> annoying 'who would be worse off without the other'
> argument...
> I am just trying to point out that it would be VERY hard
> to describe Meat's life and career without mentioning Jim
> several times!
>
> K.
>
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Can Meat Loaf Really Be NJC? - Klasien 01:48 pm UTC 02/05/10 |
| Next: |
re: NJC - forgot the NJC of course - Vin 02:09 am UTC 02/03/10 |
|
| Thread: |
|