Exactly.
Markus.
> Hmmm...the posting of 'Private of Privates' online; a good
> thing or a bad thing?
>
> A good thing of course; an unheard Steinman track is
> always a joy to hear, and I quite like this one.
>
> I don't think a song this old needs to be locked away for
> a select few, and now thankfully it has been exposed to a
> few more Steinman fans who will hopefully get some genuine
> pleasure from it.
>
> Is Jim mad? I don't think he gives two shits that it's
> 'out there', judging by more recent mp3's he has provided.
> I'll even suggest he probably forgot it existed.
>
> Is Ray mad? I would guess he 'aint really bothered.
>
> Bear in mind this is a poor recording of a 30 year plus
> piano/vocal demo. If it was gonna be used for anything, I
> think Ray and/or Jim would have done it by now.
>
> Let's be honest, it really is only gonna be heard by a few
> hundred people tops??
>
> If it was a recording of a current project (ie Bat
> musical), then that is more serious, and I would hope
> someone would check with JD first (ie seeking Jim's
> permission).
>
> I posted a brief review after hearing Privates, and
> expected a few more, instead there was a load of
> bollocks.
>
> If Jim and Ray were reading, I think they would have
> preferred some comments/reviews on the song, rather than
> who should/shouldn't have posted it.
>
> BTW - If I find anything remotely Steinman related, I'll
> always share for free, and don't need any thanks or
> credits (I hate egos), and Puddings Blog seems to be the
> logical place at the moment!
>
> So cheers to Pudding for posting his 'Privates' & running
> the blog, and cheers to Ryan for showing his 'Privates' to
> Pudding & running Bat Out Of Excess - Great Site!!
|
