| re: Vocal Production | |
|
Posted by: |
AndrewG 03:11 pm UTC 07/16/10 |
| In reply to: | Vocal Production - Scaramouche 01:55 pm UTC 07/16/10 |
| I think everyone works differently. What I don't get is when they talk about going over budget. According to Meat Bat 3 went from costing $600.000 to $1.2 million. Now I obviously don't know what that money is exactly spent on but if they talk about that kind of money why not first build your own studio so you can re-use it for next time? > > Clearly somebody, if it wasn't Meat himself, didn't want > > Jim doing the vocals. Perhaps because they felt he spent > > far too much time on them and wanted a record out in the > > last decade? > > More than likely the record label. Jim has a reputation > for taking ages and going (well) over budget. Labels rely > on the producer to get the job done within (or close to) > the budget, but I think Jim forgets after day 2. LoL > > Meat may also have suggested a separate vocal producer. He > has said in the past that he only likes doing 4-5 takes > then comping the best bits together, whereas Jim seems to > do endless takes/variations and then an eternity to listen > to them all (50 plus takes for Anything For Love?). > > I personally feel that if you can't get enough down (for a > comp vocal) jn 10-12 takes, then you have the wrong singer > for the song. > > Trick is to be well rehearsed with the vocal arrangement > BEFORE entering the expensive studio. If you start from > scratch in the studio, you are just wasting money. > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Vocal Production - Scaramouche 01:55 pm UTC 07/16/10 |
| Next: | re: Vocal Production - Conas 02:44 pm UTC 07/17/10 |
| Thread: |
|