Ryan, I really have no issue with who gave what to whom, except for the fact that you don't seem to be able to maintain the same story from one sentence to the next. First it's 2 people, then 3, then 4, then 3 again. First you didn't give it to Pudding, then you did, then you didn't. I call as evidence (ahem) this from your last message:
> I also want to confront whoever out of that party
> gave Pudding the recording.
Followed by
> I know I only gave it to the arranger, Pudding and Dave.
So, it was YOU that gave it to Pudding! Pudding then posted it. Anything else is just smoke-screening.
Dave
|
