not logged in
| re: Probably a really obvious ansewr to this but..... | |
Posted by:  |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 09:49 pm UTC 11/14/10 |
| In reply to: | re: Probably a really obvious ansewr to this but..... - Markus 09:39 pm UTC 11/14/10 |
| Yes I believe so, contributing vocals I think, and arranging the vocals. I'll be honest and say I don't quite no what "arranging vocals" is but it was still Desmond in creative control which as we all know gave us the biggest disappointment imaginable (at least in the world of Steinman) > Wasn´t Todd involved in "BAT" III? > > Markus > > > if Jim (For whatever reason)couldn't produce Bat 3 then > > why did Meat not go for the next logical choice and get > > Todd Rundgren to produce the album. > > > > I know Meat and Todd have rarely got on but they have > > worked together many times (Even on non Jim related > > projects) and both Bat 1 and Bad for good are better then > > Bat 2 IMHO and both those had Todd as producer so I > > thought that surely it would have made sense to bring him > > back. > > > > When people talk about the Bat saga its mainly Jim and > > Meat that they talk about, but I think Todd is of equal > > importance and I kinda see them as a trio. But maybe > > that's just me | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Probably a really obvious ansewr to this but..... - Markus 09:39 pm UTC 11/14/10 |
| Next: | re: Probably a really obvious ansewr to this but..... - RadioMaster 10:04 pm UTC 11/14/10 |
| Thread: |
|