Nah of course it didn't dude, and I understand where your coming from so its cool.
Back on topic, Jim once said in an interview (I don't remember which one) where he said it was right that Meat sang on Bat and he sang on Bad for good, which I agree,its sort of like two films by the same writer, except Bat is more like a horror film (Dracula) and Bad for good is like a rock n roll Sci Fi song.
> I hope that did not come off as being harsh. Wasn't
> meant that way. Just another opinion. Also, upon
> re-reading your post you said it wouldn't surprise you not
> that he did lie. Anyway, sorry if the tone came across
> different than my intent.
>
> >
> > > To be honest, I'm happy with Meat singing Bat, but I'd
> > > love that spoken about demo of Jim singing Bat to be
> > > unearthed, I know Meat said that no demo exists but
> > > perhaps the demo was for the Never land workshop, or
> > > perhaps Meat is lying, which wouldn't surprise me.
> > Meat and Jim both say things in interviews that I don't
> > think are so much lies as what used to be called "carny"
> > or I guess you could say showmanship. I doubt Meat
> > remembers everything from those days given his troubles
> > during those years. I think perhaps Meat himself did not
> > get a demo, but something may have been recorded he did
> > not use. I know Meat changes his mind a lot on stuff
> > (album great when it comes out, sucks a few years later)
> > but I don't hope this thread won't descend into calling
> > him or anyone a liar. The whole thread is speculation
> > anyway.
|
