| re: New York Phantom | |
|
Posted by: |
Scaramouche 10:24 am UTC 03/10/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Scaramouche... - rockfenris2005 09:59 am UTC 03/10/07 |
| I'm certainly intrigued to see what ALW can come up with, and who he chooses to work with (book & lyrics). I think the fact that it is a sequel to the most financially successful musical of all time, does add a little pressure. However, like ANY new musical, if there is a great book & songs, then it'll be great, if anything less, it probably won't last long, and that's for ALW to worry about. A lot of people are getting their 'knickers in a twist' over this with 'how could he' comments (as if they've got a ton of money invested in it - LOL). I say give the guy a chance, and keep an open mind. Still wonder what Jim thinks of this?? > > > Yes you are, just like you were the only person to want to > > see Batman go to stage....or so you said....repeatedly > > ;o) > > > > Pud > > I wanted the sequel from the moment I heard "The Heart Is > Slow To Learn" which was a year before the book came out. > The book is rubbish, ALW can do much better and I hope he > improves the big flaws it has. The concept in general is > very intriguing about Phantom having a son etc. Read the > book sometime, just so you can say you've experienced one > of the worst devastations to a major legacy (that is, > aside from TMIL lolol ;-) > > When the movie came out, you can just imagine me saying to > someone "KEEP A NOTE OF THIS BIT. It is a reference to the > sequel" back when I was the only one who believed a sequel > would ever happen. Well, now it has. > > Now all we need is for Warner Bros. to announce it's taken > them ten years to decide to produce Jim's "Batman". > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Scaramouche... - Pudding 10:49 am UTC 03/10/07 |
| Next: | re: New York Phantom - Smeghead 07:26 pm UTC 03/09/07 |
| Thread: | |