not logged in
| re: The demos of Jim singing | |
Posted by:  |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 02:22 pm UTC 04/16/11 |
| In reply to: | re: The demos of JIm singing - WarioLoaf 09:22 am UTC 04/16/11 |
| Jim's music lacks soul without Meat?. Dude, Meat is a very small cog in the making of the Bat albums, there Jim's albums. Why do you think Meat's other albums have failed without Jim to help him. It's Jim people love, not Meat. They just dont know it and assume he writes all his songs. Go listen to Meat singing Hot Patootie, nowhere near as good or powerful as his vocals on Bat, and that because Jim helped him, alot. Also, more passion then Jim, not a chance, not one freaking chance. Meat is prima donna who will sing a song half assed and then blame the SONG!!!!. I can name many song where Meat has no passion, yet cant name one that Jim's sung badly. If Meat doesn't like a song, he wont speak up and say he doesn't like it, he'll slug along and do a half assed job. Jim doesn't do that, he inherits the character and makes them tragic, despicable and sympathetic. For Meat, its only when he feels like it. It's been well documented that Jim taught Meat how to sing his songs, people who hear Bad for good say "that guy sounds like Meat Loaf" and you couldn't be further then the truth, its like Jim said "I dont sing like Meat, Meat sings like me" Jim's music has soul whoever sings it, and is more special then anyone who sings it is or ever will be. Meat's a copy cat, plain and simple and its Jim who should have been the body and the soul, cause ha has heaps of it himself. > WHAT THE FLIPPING HELL. > > not too thrilled how you put meat down like that. > > I think most can agree with me that Meat has NOT been > impersonating Jim practically his whole career. In fact > its his own way of singing. Before he even met Jim he was > singing like he did on Bat. If anything Meat has small bit > of Elvis in his singing. which is fine by me, I love > hearing the Elvis voice every once in a while. > meat sounded nothing like he was impersonating Jim.ever. > > In fact you could argue Jim was trying to do an impression > of meat on BFG. > > I realize you are a big fan of Jim's singing, but thats > crossing a line. > > Meat is leaps and bounds more passionate in his voice then > jim, and the demos, while fantastic and interesting to > hear, cant hold a candle to the meat loaf counterparts. > > Only thing I remotely agree with is he should've written > more stuff. Jim's the body, but Meat's the soul. Without > Meat, Jim's songs lack soul IMO. > > Nothing personal, just disagree almost entirely with this > statement. > > > are only further proof that he was branded with an unfair > > stigma that he couldn't sing. Why? Someone please, tell me > > why is it Jim's singing voice is so looked down on, > > especially by Loaf fan boys, which only makes me chuckle > > since Meat's been doing an impression of Jim's singing > > style piratically his whole career. Jim's vocal on Heaven > > Can Wait is amazing, the "la la la's" at the end had me in > > tears almost. The intro to the 89 version Who Needs the > > Young, incredible. Jim should have stuck at it in my > > opinion, gone solo. Not to say he shouldn't have written > > stuff for Meat or Bonnie, but also recorded more of his > > own stuff himself. The magic we could have had. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: The demos of JIm singing - Evil_One 08:39 pm UTC 04/16/11 |
| Next: | re: The demos of Jim singing - Evil_One 02:53 pm UTC 04/16/11 |
| Thread: |
|