not logged in
| A 'Restraint of trade' clause n/m | |
Posted by:  |
Wilbury 07:09 am UTC 04/26/11 |
| In reply to: | It's a safe assumption that Jim is still currently legally muzzled. - Wilbury 06:58 am UTC 04/26/11 |
> The settlement that Jim's and meat's camps came to that > allowed Meat to release Bat3 in the way he did would > DEFINITELY have also stipulated that Jim would not be > allowed to release anything in any form for X years. > Perhaps 5+ years. We know that the agreement forces Jim to > call his musical JIM STEINMAN's BooH, and it is a no > brainer that there would also be a 'lockout period'. > > Otherwise Jim, Rinkoff and Bova could release something > very similar 12 months after the release of Meat and > Desmond's thing, and make a mockery of the entire > settlement process. > > Whether that's the sole reason for Jim's silence, who > knows? But I'd say there's a good chance it might be the > main reason, given he was seemingly in the middle of a > number of projects that both he and JD seemed happy enough > to keep us updated with. > > You'd have to think that TMiL made Jim a LOT of money. I > hope so. > > > If he was busy we would have seen something happening by > > now; we haven't. That's a sign he's doing very little. JD > > isn't allowed to say anything, Jim isn't allowed to say > > anything, so I'd have to ask the question who the hell is > > running Jim's life FOR him? If Jim wasn't planning on > > doing anything anymore someone should just say it, if he's > > taking a break from writing for another few years then > > just say it. I can't see what the big secret is. As I've > > said already it's an insult to the fans. Jim likes his > > privacy my ass, that's just an excuse, if he was like that > > he wouldn't have joined Facebook. > > > > > > > > > It's upsetting and frustrating Jim wont speak up and at > > > least let us know he's okay. I havent counted the guy out > > > and I believe something will happen. An update would be > > > nice, but I think J.D gets in trouble whenever she > > > mentions anything about Jim on here, which is a shame, its > > > a shame he doesn't let us know how he's doing, but I > > > believe its because he's busy. People have been away > > > longer then Jim has still come back in a blaze of glory, | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | It's a safe assumption that Jim is still currently legally muzzled. - Wilbury 06:58 am UTC 04/26/11 |
| Next: | re: "Songs By Jim Steinman" - RSG 12:02 am UTC 04/26/11 |
| Thread: | |