| re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 01:08 am UTC 05/16/11 |
| In reply to: | re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 05:16 pm UTC 05/15/11 |
| > I hardly say that original sin is "padded out" There area > total of 6 (at the time, new)songs, two awesome monologues > and two covers, one of which we're pretty good. The only > padding on the album I think are the covers. Same may > argue the monologues aren't very good but I think there > great, Dreaming up a storm may well be the best monologue > that Jim has performed. I have to agree. I often agree with Evil One but not when he says "all the shit Jim used to pad out Original Sin." I never think of Jim as being someone who would use shit to pad anything out. This is what makes him different from hack songwriters like Diane Warren and Frank Wildhorn. > You want padding, go listen to Bat 2. A lot of people love that album. Me too. Its the mature sequel to Bat 1. Bat 3 is full of padding. Its wall to wall. > > It's no worse than all the shit Jim used to pad out > > Original Sin. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 05:16 pm UTC 05/15/11 |
| Next: | re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - rockfenris2005 05:32 pm UTC 05/15/11 |
| Thread: | |