HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket

Posted by:
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 05:16 pm UTC 05/15/11
In reply to: re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - Evil_One 03:32 pm UTC 05/15/11

I hardly say that original sin is "padded out" There area total of 6 (at the time, new)songs, two awesome monologues and two covers, one of which we're pretty good. The only padding on the album I think are the covers. Same may argue the monologues aren't very good but I think there great, Dreaming up a storm may well be the best monologue that Jim has performed.

You want padding, go listen to Bat 2. Filled with recycled songs, that are usually worse then there original, and even a freaking recycled monologue. At least everything on Orginal Sin,that was written by Jim, was new, or at least never before released commercially (With the exception of the Storm extract)

> > Yup. But I'm still not sure about the filler on WTTN. I
> > know it's a concept album, but "45 seconds of
> > ecstasy"...really...
>
> It's no worse than all the shit Jim used to pad out
> Original Sin.


reply |

Previous: re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - Evil_One 03:32 pm UTC 05/15/11
Next: re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - steven_stuart 01:08 am UTC 05/16/11

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE