| re: A Very Interesting History Of Art Thread | |
|
Posted by: |
Wilbury 02:54 pm UTC 05/20/11 |
| In reply to: | re: A Very Interesting History Of Art Thread - rockfenris2005 02:34 pm UTC 05/20/11 |
> > How did you think that wasn't an original by Whelan? Is it > because it looks so different to the other versions? I > think it must have been an early draft. It looks so much like the bat 2 guy, stance, ball of light in his hand etc, that I assumed it WAS the bat 2 guy! And because the colours appear all snafu, like they've been manipulated at the same time they put the big ugly translucent/bevelled title over the top, I assumed it was a collage of the bat 2 and vbo covers. But as you point out, clearly isn't. My bad. > You've really brought this to my attention now LOL > > I love the cover art for Bat 2 and now it's annoying me! Welcome to my world! :o) | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: A Very Interesting History Of Art Thread - rockfenris2005 02:34 pm UTC 05/20/11 |
| Next: | Here's the method behind my madness… - Wilbury 10:51 am UTC 05/17/11 |
| Thread: | |