HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: A Very Interesting History Of Art Thread

Posted by:
Wilbury 02:54 pm UTC 05/20/11
In reply to: re: A Very Interesting History Of Art Thread - rockfenris2005 02:34 pm UTC 05/20/11


>
> How did you think that wasn't an original by Whelan? Is it
> because it looks so different to the other versions? I
> think it must have been an early draft.

It looks so much like the bat 2 guy, stance, ball of light in his hand etc, that I assumed it WAS the bat 2 guy! And because the colours appear all snafu, like they've been manipulated at the same time they put the big ugly translucent/bevelled title over the top, I assumed it was a collage of the bat 2 and vbo covers. But as you point out, clearly isn't. My bad.


> You've really brought this to my attention now LOL
>
> I love the cover art for Bat 2 and now it's annoying me!

Welcome to my world!

:o)



reply |

Previous: re: A Very Interesting History Of Art Thread - rockfenris2005 02:34 pm UTC 05/20/11
Next: Here's the method behind my madness… - Wilbury 10:51 am UTC 05/17/11

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE