| re: Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1 | |
|
Posted by: |
Wilbury 02:32 pm UTC 06/10/11 |
| In reply to: | re: Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1 - Ravishing 01:32 pm UTC 06/10/11 |
| Uh-oh, looks like Ravishing is well and truly losing the game so far… > > > On MLFUCK, 09 Jul 2010, 18:05, Meat said re: TMiL: > > I was hoping Jim would come on board and help finish > > the record. with a couple of different songs. Get rid of > > Monster and a couple of others. The lyrics on monster are > > just not well structured. > > > > So lemme get this right… Meat was hoping that Jim, whom he > > had just finished suing and taking IP from, would come in > > and salvage the already well-advanced body of songs > > written and/or arranged by Desmond Child, in some bid to > > protect the very IP that Meat had just taken from him for > > the purposes of the album Desmond CHild was now making. > > > > Hmm… > > > > I'm gonna give Meat the benefit of the doubt here and say > > that, somehow, he actually DID think that Jim would be > > willing to come in somewhere along the line and help fix > > his and Desmond's trainwreck of an album that shits all > > over his own legacy. I'll go with Naive. > > The fact that this quote alone doesn't make it obvious > that there was far more going on behind the scenes that we > don't know is astounding. > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1 - Ravishing 01:32 pm UTC 06/10/11 |
| Next: | re: Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1 - daveake 01:24 pm UTC 06/10/11 |
| Thread: | |