HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1

Posted by:
Wilbury 02:32 pm UTC 06/10/11
In reply to: re: Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1 - Ravishing 01:32 pm UTC 06/10/11

Uh-oh, looks like Ravishing is well and truly losing the game so far…

>
> > On MLFUCK, 09 Jul 2010, 18:05, Meat said re: TMiL:
> > I was hoping Jim would come on board and help finish
> > the record. with a couple of different songs. Get rid of
> > Monster and a couple of others. The lyrics on monster are
> > just not well structured.

> >
> > So lemme get this right… Meat was hoping that Jim, whom he
> > had just finished suing and taking IP from, would come in
> > and salvage the already well-advanced body of songs
> > written and/or arranged by Desmond Child, in some bid to
> > protect the very IP that Meat had just taken from him for
> > the purposes of the album Desmond CHild was now making.
> >
> > Hmm…
> >
> > I'm gonna give Meat the benefit of the doubt here and say
> > that, somehow, he actually DID think that Jim would be
> > willing to come in somewhere along the line and help fix
> > his and Desmond's trainwreck of an album that shits all
> > over his own legacy. I'll go with Naive.
>
> The fact that this quote alone doesn't make it obvious
> that there was far more going on behind the scenes that we
> don't know is astounding.
>


reply |

Previous: re: Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1 - Ravishing 01:32 pm UTC 06/10/11
Next: re: Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1 - daveake 01:24 pm UTC 06/10/11

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE