| re: Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1 |
|
Posted by:
 |
Ravishing 01:32 pm UTC 06/10/11 |
| In reply to: |
Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1 - Wilbury 10:28 am UTC 06/10/11 |
|
> On MLFUCK, 09 Jul 2010, 18:05, Meat said re: TMiL:
> I was hoping Jim would come on board and help finish
> the record. with a couple of different songs. Get rid of
> Monster and a couple of others. The lyrics on monster are
> just not well structured.
>
> So lemme get this right… Meat was hoping that Jim, whom he
> had just finished suing and taking IP from, would come in
> and salvage the already well-advanced body of songs
> written and/or arranged by Desmond Child, in some bid to
> protect the very IP that Meat had just taken from him for
> the purposes of the album Desmond CHild was now making.
>
> Hmm…
>
> I'm gonna give Meat the benefit of the doubt here and say
> that, somehow, he actually DID think that Jim would be
> willing to come in somewhere along the line and help fix
> his and Desmond's trainwreck of an album that shits all
> over his own legacy. I'll go with Naive.
The fact that this quote alone doesn't make it obvious that there was far more going on behind the scenes that we don't know is astounding.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1 - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 02:31 pm UTC 06/11/11 |
| Next: |
re: Naivety or Maliciousness, Part 1 - Wilbury 02:32 pm UTC 06/10/11 |
|
| Thread: |
|