| re: Not Allowed To Love/ Jim Needs Better Publicity | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 12:07 am UTC 07/13/11 |
| In reply to: | re: Not Allowed To Love/ Jim Needs Better Publicity - Rupert 10:08 pm UTC 07/07/11 |
| I have heard similar comments from other people. The main problem is that Jim has been in love with the story for decades. His vision of "Neverland" goes way, way back. > > > But I will only do it if we get rid of > > > the Peter Pan Juxtapostion concept because it confuses the > > > message. > > > > Can you explain in more detail? Sorry to ask you. > > > If I was pitching to someone like Karen Brady about > backing a Musical called BOOH by Jim Steinman do you think > she does not have her own view of what the story/vibe > might be? Why does she like those songs in the first > place, link it back to her own experiences and the reason > for liking it and then build your story up from those > likings. If she does not like Peter Pan because she links > it to a childrens story you have lost her. Don't give a > reason for an objection. Get her to buy in by giving her > some creative ownership even though you have probably put > the ideas into her mind in the first place. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Not Allowed To Love/ Jim Needs Better Publicity - Rupert 10:08 pm UTC 07/07/11 |
| Next: | re: Not Allowed To Love/ Jim Needs Better Publicity - rockfenris2005 11:10 am UTC 07/05/11 |
| Thread: | |