| re: Was Jim involved with Bat 3? |
|
Posted by:
 |
Wilbury 01:58 am UTC 03/18/07 |
| In reply to: |
Was Jim involved with Bat 3? - Pudding 12:47 am UTC 03/18/07 |
|
He probably wanted to sound more intelligent and precise than the highly ambiguous "Steinman became more involved as the album's development went on" which has been in every other article written.
All journalists are bullshitters. Amateurs dressed up as professionals and given an important role in democratic society. It shits me.
> According to
> href=http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/Artists/M/Meat_Loaf/2007/03/17/3769086.html>THIS
> article, it says Steinman wrote seven songs and also
> became involved during the mixing process
>
> Seems like someone's bullshitting.
>
> Pud
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Was Jim involved with Bat 3? - rockfenris2005 03:48 am UTC 03/18/07 |
| Next: |
re: Was Jim involved with Bat 3? - Venom 01:48 am UTC 03/18/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|