HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Was Jim involved with Bat 3?
Posted by:	rockfenris2005 03:48 am UTC 03/18/07
In reply to:	Was Jim involved with Bat 3? - Pudding 12:47 am UTC 03/18/07
Considering Jim didn't know about the lyrical changes to his songs I say it's a lie. If it isn't, I have no idea why Jim would say that.
reply |
Previous:	Was Jim involved with Bat 3? - Pudding 12:47 am UTC 03/18/07
Next:	re: Was Jim involved with Bat 3? - Wilbury 01:58 am UTC 03/18/07
Thread:

HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE