| re: Sarah Brightman Was ALW's Only Muse | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 08:37 am UTC 04/27/13 |
| In reply to: | Sarah Brightman Was ALW's Only Muse - steven_stuart 02:28 am UTC 04/27/13 |
If Michael Crawford and Sarah Brightman had reprised their parts for the sequel, it wouldn't necessarily have been super awesome, more like depressing because they would have committed themselves to a bad script and a bad storyline, no matter how great the music was. > Why more depressing? You are a Sarah fan. And don't you > think he did some of his best work when he was in love > with her? Had they already started their relationship when > he did Cats? If he had still been with Sarah and if he had > still been in the very passionate mood that she could put > him in, then he might have had the creative energy to make > LND much better than it was. > > > > But surely he knew that LND would never be like Phantom. I > > > wonder if LND would have been different if Sarah Brightman > > > had been involved. If anyone has ever been ALW's muse, it > > > is her. She is still in very good shape. I think she has > > > taken good care of her singing voice. > > > > > > > If Sarah had been involved, it would still be the same > > script but with Sarah playing the role of Christine, which > > might make it more interesting, but more depressing for me > > I think. > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Sarah Brightman Was ALW's Only Muse - steven_stuart 02:28 am UTC 04/27/13 |
| Next: | What About If Cameron Mackintosh Had Produced Love Never Dies? - steven_stuart 01:45 am UTC 04/28/13 |
| Thread: |
|