HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Sarah Brightman Was ALW's Only Muse

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 08:37 am UTC 04/27/13
In reply to: Sarah Brightman Was ALW's Only Muse - steven_stuart 02:28 am UTC 04/27/13


If Michael Crawford and Sarah Brightman had reprised their parts for the sequel, it wouldn't necessarily have been super awesome, more like depressing because they would have committed themselves to a bad script and a bad storyline, no matter how great the music was.

> Why more depressing? You are a Sarah fan. And don't you
> think he did some of his best work when he was in love
> with her? Had they already started their relationship when
> he did Cats? If he had still been with Sarah and if he had
> still been in the very passionate mood that she could put
> him in, then he might have had the creative energy to make
> LND much better than it was.
>
> > > But surely he knew that LND would never be like Phantom. I
> > > wonder if LND would have been different if Sarah Brightman
> > > had been involved. If anyone has ever been ALW's muse, it
> > > is her. She is still in very good shape. I think she has
> > > taken good care of her singing voice.
> > >
> >
> > If Sarah had been involved, it would still be the same
> > script but with Sarah playing the role of Christine, which
> > might make it more interesting, but more depressing for me
> > I think.
>


reply |

Previous: Sarah Brightman Was ALW's Only Muse - steven_stuart 02:28 am UTC 04/27/13
Next: What About If Cameron Mackintosh Had Produced Love Never Dies? - steven_stuart 01:45 am UTC 04/28/13

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE