HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: now we have 6...

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 04:03 pm UTC 02/19/14
In reply to: re: now we have 6... - Vin 03:40 pm UTC 02/19/14



> When I think about it - which isn't often - I still find
> it stunning how flat the Steinman tunes on Bat III fell. I
> had originally been hopeful that Desmond would do a good
> job, but Lord did he screw the pooch on that record. And
> inexplicably in some instances, too. Like, I'm hard
> pressed to understand how anybody involved took a good
> listen to the Bat III IACBTMN arrangement and said, "Yup,
> this is fucking killer." The piano sounds like wilted
> lettuce and they inexcusably cut a verse. An excellent
> fucking verse. Cue Nancy Kerrigan: "Whyyyyyyyyyy??!?!"
>

They just sound bland to me. Compare Meat's "Bad for good" to Jim's original. Meat's live version shows you how it could have been, but it wasn't to be. The changes on "Pig" are just baffling. I don't get why they did that. "Break it" I'm sorry does not feel like the complete thing when it isn't "Only when I feel". And I wish that was the song that got released. I like "Break it" but I love "Only when I feel".

Oddly, the best moments of that album for me, are the non-Jim songs. I really like "Cry over me".



reply |

Previous: re: now we have 6... - Vin 03:40 pm UTC 02/19/14
Next: re: now we have 6... - Infinite_Victims 06:18 pm UTC 02/19/14

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE