Hope I have not only for us fans,but also for the artists involved.
Markus
> The same was said about Bat II. No one cared about Meat at
> the time. And yet it was their biggest success after Bat
> I. There was a reason for it - the magic only Jim can
> make! For me it's clear that this is the only possibility
> to make it a big hit again. Sorry Meat, sorry Paul. You're
> great but sometimes that's just not enough. And that's why
> I still hope for an original and not a copy.
>
> Markus
>
> > > Jim will never accept a Hell in a Handbasket 2. LOL
> >
> > I sure hope so! I believe I remember that some folks here
> > said something along the lines of actually liking the
> > Handbasket album, but for me I must confess that it was
> > the first Loaf album that I had a big urge to turn off
> > before having listened to it all the way through. As far
> > as I'm concerned, even Teddybear was quite a bit better.
> >
> > Of course, taste differs, and my dislike for Handbasket
> > surely is in no way related with Mr Crook's production,
> > but rather with the fact that the big majority of songs on
> > that album suck. So, Crook's production along with Jim's
> > songs and a few additional tracks of similar quality could
> > very well work out. Especially if Jim is asked for input
> > in production and when Rinkoff is also involved. While
> > can't imagine that the forthcoming album will be one more
> > really major international success (Meat's probably past
> > the point of achieving such things by now), I can very
> > well imagine a well-deserved limited success as this could
> > really become an album that those involved in the making
> > as well as the fans can be proud of. It certainly is,
> > after a long, long time, the first Steinman-related
> > project that I'm positively looking forward to. Let's wait
> > and see how things turn out! :-)
|
