| re: These ones are run-of-the-mill but what the hell | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 12:05 pm UTC 03/26/07 |
| In reply to: | re: These ones are run-of-the-mill but what the hell - Brian 03:07 pm UTC 03/25/07 |
> I just rewatched Dracula for the first time since i was > like 13... its a beautiful looking film, but the script is > uneven as hell. supposedly that one was cut before > release too, i remember a longer bootleg making the rounds > back in 1994, 1995. > I never even thought there'd be a longer "Dracula". How fascinating. Do you know about any of the cut scenes? > as for frankenstein i dont remember it, but incidentally > it was on the HD channel the other day and i tivoed it, > just havent had the time to watch. i remember being > disappointed. I was shocked by it. I love the novel. There were several parts that were the biggest WTF moments I've had watching a movie. > > also BrainDead (aka Dead Alive) was Jacksons 3rd film > actually. first was Bad Taste, which is my favorite one > as its just so ridiculously over the top and you really > get the sense of everyone pooling their talent together to > make a movie for the sake of making it. > Ohhh ok. What are the quality of these early films like? "Heavenly Creatures" was a nicely done independent in New Zealand (I THINK. Don't quote me on that.) > then theres also meet the feebles which ive honestly never > made my way thru, but its certainly an interesting film. I know about that one, never seen it tho. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: These ones are run-of-the-mill but what the hell - Brian 03:07 pm UTC 03/25/07 |
| Next: | re: These ones are run-of-the-mill but what the hell - Brian 03:32 pm UTC 03/26/07 |
| Thread: |
|