| re: Bat 3. Ten years on. |
|
Posted by:
 |
Lordy 08:18 am UTC 04/10/16 |
| In reply to: |
re: Bat 3. Ten years on. - Jacqueline 03:07 am UTC 04/10/16 |
|
No but it was the perfect platform.
I can also imagine it on one of these charity adverts. A country ravaged by war, children alone, no parents and living in poverty - I can hear it playing in the background,
>
> Was it sung on x factor? It would be great.
>
> > bat 3 is just lack lustre! It's a bad record
> > BFG is a hollow on this record - it has no substance what
> > so ever! There are HUGE gaps !!!!! No cannons!!
> > Pig is prob the best 1 on there but nowhere close to 'the
> > original pig'! And that should be on the new record!!!
> > I never listen to the non Jim tracks because they dont
> > make sense. The writing is poor and the production is
> > basic.
> > However
> > I do play future every now and again. After the Paris
> > attacks I could see someone singing it on the X factor!
> > Thought it summed up the whole mood when that happened.
> >
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Bat 3. Ten years on. - Jacqueline 03:07 am UTC 04/10/16 |
| Next: |
re: Bat 3. Ten years on. - rockfenris2005 08:31 am UTC 04/10/16 |
|
| Thread: |
|