HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

I just read the full thing

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 07:28 pm UTC 06/24/16
In reply to: Great fan review of Braver - Jacqueline 12:29 am UTC 06/24/16


It IS pretty spectacular. Reading this you almost think it's going to go right off. Who knows though? I still think if they release "Who needs the young?" as a single that you might get a really interesting reaction out of that. Anyway, come and post here as well, Stuart. I would be interested to hear more of your thoughts on other things too.

> This was sent to Jim via Facebook and he wanted it shared
> here. Many thanks Stuart!
>
> Stuart Lund 3:07pm Jun 23
> There are two kinds of Meat Loaf fans in the world. There
> are those who love everything he records, then there are
> those who like everything her records but love everything
> he records that was written by the man who started it all,
> Jim Steinman. I count myself in the latter group.
> Since Bat Out OF Hell in 1977, Meat has teamed up with
> Steinman, both directly and indirectly, many times, but
> there have been three particular milestones on that long
> and twisted road that have stood out against the rest –
> Bat Out of Hell, Dead Ringer and the epic Bat Out of Hell
> II. Despite some questions over the production of the
> middle link in the chain, all three of these albums had
> one thing in common – all of the songs were written by
> Steinman.
>
> In 2006, lightning should have struck again with the
> release of Bat Out Of Hell III, but the powers that be had
> other ideas. Steinman was in ill health, a record company
> wanted the album complete and Meat went along with
> bringing in Bon Jovi producer Desmond Child to fill the
> void. It could have worked, but you have to be a certain
> type of person to “get” Steinman. Todd Rundgren “got” him
> when he produced Bat, Child didn’t. The album ended up
> consisting of a handful of Steinman songs, altered and
> mostly condensed to make the way for additional tracks by
> Child which turned the album into a mishmash of could have
> beens, should have beens and should never have beens.
>
> Jump forward to 2014, when rumours began to circulate that
> Meat was planning a new album, and Jim could be providing
> one or two new tracks. A year later, the album was now
> going to feature more new Steinman material, and in June
> 2016, the album was in the can and the cover art bore the
> words that fans had waited over 20 years to see. All Songs
> by Jim Steinman. At the top of the cover, under the album
> title, Braver Than We Are. Combined with the stunning
> cover art by Julie Bell – a cleverly crafted montage piece
> featuring Meat himself and a youthful image of Steinman
> (being the boy who never grew up) facing off against the
> four horsemen of the apocalypse, who just happen to be
> riding some of the iconic bikes featured on the covers of
> previous Meat/Steinman collaborations, and all against a
> sky that looks suspiciously like that featured on the Bat
> Out Of Hell Cover. Suddenly, this album was very real and
> very exciting.
>
> Prior to release, Meat has cited the album as “different”,
> “love it or hate it”, “something that will make you want
> to throw it against the wall”, much of which could have
> been said about Bat on its release. So just how different
> and rage-inducing is the album?
> On first listen, there are some things instantly
> noticeable – the album is not full of perfectly pitched
> vocals like most people seem to want these days. It is not
> full of radio friendly pop songs, although it contains
> some of the most memorable and catchy songs of Meat and
> Steinman’s career. It is an album that all but drips with
> raw, passionate drama that would make Wagner (the composer
> not the X Factor contestant) weep with anguish. THIS is
> the album Bat Out Of Hell III should have been, and THIS
> is quite possibly the biggest middle finger to the current
> music scene that has ever been released. People are going
> to hate this record. People are going to love this record.
> But more than that, people are going to feel with this
> record. The lyrics tell a story, the music seduces you and
> pulls you into the world in which the story is being told.
> These are not half-baked pop lyrics about getting boys out
> of your hair or saying sorry. They are full on, relevant
> and powerful.
> As an album overview, the production – by Paul Crook – is
> outstanding. Bold and experimental, grand and subtle when
> it needs to be, again something that seems to be missing
> from much of today’s music. Another highlight is the
> stunning backing vocals arranged by Justin Avery, phrased
> and produced in an amazing collage of sounds, emotions and
> in a couple of cases completely off the wall theatrics.
> Musically the album is sound. Each song in its own world,
> with its own rules. And then we have the main vocals, a
> point which will cause the love/hate factor for many.
>
> Meat is not thirty years old any more, he is heading
> towards an age where many have given up and are soaking up
> the easy life. But that has never been his style. Meat has
> never sounded his age as much as he does on this album;
> gruff at times, frail at others, sometimes resorting to a
> low baritone growl. This is not the vocal performance of
> two decades ago, this is Meat now, musically presenting a
> drama for the ears. His vocal is rough, and in many cases
> in a lower range to much of this previous work, but it
> works in the context of the album for those who, and we
> return to that point again, “get it”. These are not your
> regular songs. There is no auto-tune here. It is raw,
> unashamed, blood and guts, anguished rock opera that will
> likely never be seen again. In a basic, ground level
> comparison, I fully expect Meat’s vocals to come up
> against the same critical mauling that the likes of Bob
> Dylan, Nick Cave and Tom Waits have constantly defied
> their whole careers. It is not for everyone, but I
> guarantee, let the album play a few times and not only
> will you start to see the bigger picture, but there will
> be words and melodies that you just cannot get away from
> and will linger with you long after. Compared to Meat’s
> previous two albums, which while both having their merits
> have lacked that special ingredient to make them
> memorable, this shows why no one quite does Steinman like
> Meat Loaf, but equally no-one brings to Meat Loaf what
> Steinman brings to Meat Loaf.
> Here is my track by track analysis of the album.
>
> Who Needs The Young as an opener is just inspired. It's
> like a creepy, mishmash circus has just rolled into town
> and the ringmaster is stepping up to the crowd. There is a
> dark comedy about it – the Steinman touch. It has been
> said that the track was originally destined to be part of
> the original Bat album, and considering it is one of
> Steinman’s oldest pieces that is plausible enough, but it
> was considered too vile for the times. Once again,
> something that cannot be argued against. Meat’s precise
> delivery of every syllable, something that rings through
> the album, heightens the bizarre air around the song.
> Backing vocals under the arrangement of Justin Avery are
> spectacular and not unlike some of Steinman’s own
> arrangements of the past, and again they add to this
> strange circus of horrors feel and engulf you in a
> multi-layered, visual masterpiece for the ears. Sorry for
> the repetition but you just don’t get that in any other
> music out there today.
>
> If there was a song to be released as a single (and some
> would question whether in today’s convoluted singles
> market where everything from celebrity deaths to political
> agendas can dictate chart positions), then this massive
> beast was always going to be the radio defying track to
> break out. Known to followers of Steinman’s other work,
> the track is better known as Braver Than We Are, as seen
> in a track performed by Karine Hannah (featuring a dance
> music backing track) and in the smash musical Tanz Der
> Vampire. Partially rewritten, rearranged and boasting an
> almost 12 minute run time, Going All The Way Is Just The
> Start (A Song In Six Movements) could well be the final
> sparkling jewel in the Steinman crown. As Steinman wrote
> in Rock and Roll Dreams Come Through, “There’s always
> something magic, there’s always something new”, and as
> with his previous epics that has never been truer than
> here. From a quiet, subtle opening, the song progresses
> through its aforementioned movements, falling and rising
> similar to 1993’s I’d Do Anything For Love (But I Won’t Do
> That), and building to a six minute culmination that is
> quite possibly the most stunning piece of musicality I
> have heard in my life. Meat is ably supported throughout
> by Ellen Foley (better known as the female vocalist from
> Paradise by the Dashboard Light) and Karla DeVito (who
> performed Paradise during Meat’s early tours and appears
> in its video), who help elevate the song even further. It
> is an indescribable piece that is both hopefully
> optimistic and devastatingly honest with a melody that
> just soars into the heavens and beyond. The song title,
> which is a line that also appeared at the beginning of the
> music video for Anything For Love, is not only
> quintessential Steinman but probably his defining one. He
> has gone all the way on many occasions and it just never
> seems to be enough. Going All The Way is a song to live
> your life by. It's a call to everyone to take all they can
> from life, live every moment and push everything to limit
> and then push further while you can. A true masterpiece.
>
> Speaking in Tongues is the album’s Two Out Of Three,
> gentle, subtle and containing some of the excellent
> wordplay that comes with most Steinman tracks. Meat’s
> mellow vocal is complimented by additional vocals to
> create something ethereal and emotional. (More to be
> added)
>
> Loving You's a Dirty Job (But Somebody’s Got To Do It) is
> best known as a duet between Bonnie Tyler and Todd
> Rundgren when it was produced by Steinman for her album.
> Here it is given a musically modern twist, again a sense
> of building throughout the song to its conclusion. It will
> gain obvious comparisons to the previous version, and one
> thing of note here is that Meat’s careful and deliberate
> pronunciation is one thing that stands out, when every one
> of those lyrics is heard and understood, compared to
> Rundgren’s original vocal which was sometimes harder to
> discern. A completely different arrangement and
> performance style, again making this a track that people
> will either love or hate.
>
> Souvenirs is another early Steinman track now getting the
> Meat Loaf treatment, albeit with something a little
> reminiscent of a late 70s/early 80s Bob Dylan thanks to
> some wonderful organ and horns. As with so many songs,
> there are links to previously released works –
> specifically the melodic similarity to Left in The Dark
> which Meat recorded for 1995’s Welcome To The
> Neighborhood, which featured on Steinman’s own Bad For
> Good album and, for completeness, was also released by
> Barbara Streisand. Souvenirs predates these and was
> probably the first time the melody was used. This is one
> of the things that the album has going for it in
> abundance, much of what you hear sounds instantly familiar
> yet new thanks to small sections of melody, repeated
> lyrics and chord progressions that are all part of the
> Steinman trademark. Another lyrical tour de force,
> containing the same heart-wrenching grit of classic tracks
> such as For Crying Out Loud, and coming in at over 8
> minutes long is another standout piece on the album.
> Only When I Feel as the shortest piece is packed with more
> passion than probably even Meat has ever recorded and if
> it's piano thunder you're looking for then this is where
> you will find it. The track was originally destined for
> Bat 3 as part of the song that became (If It Ain’t Broke)
> Break It – something that seems to have been fated in that
> it was discarded from the album where it would not have
> been given the Grand Guignol treatment it receives here.
> There is something about the track that could almost make
> it a prelude to Anything For Love – in that way that all
> Steinman songs seem to fit together in a complex puzzle.
> Meat went on record as saying he abandoned a perfect vocal
> on this as he had to sing it as though he were in pain,
> and for me at least that works. Another of those tracks
> that some people are going hate and pull apart, but in the
> context of the concept of the song, a harsh imperfect
> vocal is what is needed. The small sadness is that we will
> never know what the full song, including Break It, would
> have sounded like done under this production.
>
> More was originally recorded by the Sisters of Mercy and
> has been used in MTV’s Wuthering Heights remake. A modern,
> driving rocker which comes in two parts, one of which will
> be familiar again to Steinman fans who have heard his
> Batman demos. Meat’s vocal again changes throughout the
> track, pulling back on some parts and growling through on
> others. (More to add)
>
> Godz is another “long lost” Steinman piece that will sound
> familiar to fans of Tanz Der Vampire. The thundering piano
> and drum base of the song are based on Bolero, while the
> track itself is a choral, theatrical piece that could have
> come straight from something like Carmen. It is the type
> of track you will struggle to find on any other popular
> rock or pop album, mainly because it takes balls to do
> anything this different and expect to get anywhere. It is
> safe to say that if an unknown artist attempted, they
> would have the same struggle Meat and Jim did back in the
> late 70s. It also adds to the nostalgia that this album
> carries with it, and something of a full circle “end of
> show” feel that everything seems to glide towards. The
> Bolero theme was used as an introduction in the original
> Bat Tour, more nostalgia for those old time fans.
>
> Skull of Your Country is another track that originated in
> the 70s under a different title. Considering in technical
> terms this is around 40 years old, Steinman has made a
> song that is as relevant now with powerful imagery as
> anything released in the last decade. The song also
> features a section based on the “Turn Around” lyric from
> another Bonnie Tyler hit, Total Eclipse of The Heart. Non
> fans may well believe this to be reworking from that song,
> where in truth this, or a version of it, predated Total
> Eclipse by some time. Its inclusion here once again makes
> something unfamiliar instantly recognisable.
>
> Train of Love is a fun closer to the album. Again based on
> a song written back in the 70s, this had that bouncy,
> energetic quality of Dead Ringer For Love. A funky pop
> rocker that is littered with classic lines from various
> other songs to bring the album to a well rounded, rocking
> all night close.
>
> To summarise, this is an album that has been a long time
> coming, and if you are on board with the direction and the
> style that I has been done, as I was from the first
> moment, then this is likely to be right up there in your
> estimation with anything the pair have put out in the
> past. For me, I would love for nothing more than Meat to
> hang up his touring boots and sit down with Steinman every
> few months to record a couple of new tracks, unlikely but
> we all have our rock and roll dreams. For now, though
> Braver Than We Are, with an abundance of bonus materials
> including demos and bonus tracks across its various
> releases, is something the world has been deprived of for
> a long time, and, if only history told a different story,
> could have been heard long ago when the promise of more to
> come could be realised.


reply |

Previous: re: Great fan review of Braver - Gulenkov 03:18 pm UTC 06/25/16
Next: re: Great fan review of Braver - Tremorlor 06:14 am UTC 06/24/16

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE