HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Bat III

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 01:28 pm UTC 05/10/21
In reply to: re: Bat III - steven_stuart 12:09 pm UTC 05/10/21


I believe he was referring to the album (Bat III) as that damnable shit fest, only he referred to it as "Monster is Loose" which speaks volumes. Meat has also said "There is no Bat III". It leaves us with an interesting debate. There is technically a "Bat III" that you can still buy, but spiritually does it count as "Bat III"?

I like the album. How I judge it, ultimately in the end, is you can listen to it in the car. I obviously don't like it as much as the other two and was profoundly disappointed over what happened. Fifteen years later I still think the whole situation was BS and they should have done it together at some point. If they'd been allowed to wait till Braver, they could have done a Bat III together then.

> Ryan, what exactly did Jim mean by that?
>
> > He had made this comment while talking about "Only When I
> > Feel" from Braver on social media in 2016:
> >
> > Quote:
> >
> > I LOVE "Only When I Feel" -- but Meat cut the fast heavy
> > bridge on that damnable shit fest THE MONSTER IS LOOSE,
> > and now heís JUST cut the slow yearning part. Itís like
> > splitting Siamese twins apart with a chainsaw!! But I love
> > hearing the heartbreaking part. JS
> >
> >
> > > I remember based on the blog and messages here that
> > > Steinman had an order not to comment negatively on Bat 3
> > > (in public)
> > >
> > > Does anyone have his true (candid) opinions on the album?
> > >
> > > Not meaning to be insensitive. But the gossip in me has
> > > always felt that Jim did not do well being gagged.


reply |

Previous: re: Bat III - steven_stuart 12:09 pm UTC 05/10/21
Next: re: Bat III - steven_stuart 08:42 pm UTC 05/11/21

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE