Yeah the John Deacon thing is a pity -- you gotta really admire him for makioong teh decision and sticking to it. None of this on again off again like a lot of people.
He decided to put up his feet, gave his blessing for the Q+PR thing (and DIDN'T give his blessing for the Queen + Any other talentless bastard like Five or Robbie Williams, gotta love him for that) and that's that.
It's a pity he's not writing music anymore tho!? I'm sure I believe that he isn't, his songs are so great.
> > Paul Rodgers, and everything you say, is all well and
> > good. I just don't like the idea of Queen reforming like
> > INXS who even auditioned their own new singer. Just form a
> > new band or call it something different.
>
> Paul Rodgers is OK, nothing special IMO but he's OK. If
> Queen really wanted to pump out a new album and say "THIS
> IS QUEEN" then they really need John Deacon onboard to
> give it credibility...again IMO
>
> Personally I'd like Queen to do a new album but with guest
> vocalists and not just the one. Freddie was unique, one of
> the greatest showmen ever, and that'll be difficult for a
> lot of people to get past.
>
> Pud
|
