"you gotta really admire him for makioong teh decision".
Awesome!
> Yeah the John Deacon thing is a pity -- you gotta really
> admire him for makioong teh decision and sticking to it.
> None of this on again off again like a lot of people.
>
> He decided to put up his feet, gave his blessing for the
> Q+PR thing (and DIDN'T give his blessing for the Queen +
> Any other talentless bastard like Five or Robbie Williams,
> gotta love him for that) and that's that.
>
> It's a pity he's not writing music anymore tho!? I'm sure
> I believe that he isn't, his songs are so great.
>
>
>
> > > Paul Rodgers, and everything you say, is all well and
> > > good. I just don't like the idea of Queen reforming like
> > > INXS who even auditioned their own new singer. Just form a
> > > new band or call it something different.
> >
> > Paul Rodgers is OK, nothing special IMO but he's OK. If
> > Queen really wanted to pump out a new album and say "THIS
> > IS QUEEN" then they really need John Deacon onboard to
> > give it credibility...again IMO
> >
> > Personally I'd like Queen to do a new album but with guest
> > vocalists and not just the one. Freddie was unique, one of
> > the greatest showmen ever, and that'll be difficult for a
> > lot of people to get past.
> >
> > Pud
|
