| re: Sex and Dru[g]s and Rock and Roll... |
|
Posted by:
 |
rockfenris2005 08:07 pm UTC 04/12/07 |
| In reply to: |
re: Sex and Dru[g]s and Rock and Roll... - Conas 07:56 pm UTC 04/12/07 |
|
> I heard that you get very creative when you smoke some
> wacky tacky (pot) I know a lot of songwriters get stoned
> before they write songs. I smoked pot before and I never
> felt creative I felt horny but not creative.
>
> This is actually a really good thread I always wondered
> why he didn't use the word "drugs"... when I'm singing the
> song to myself I always say "SEX..DRUGS..AND ROCK N ROLL".
> Using the word "drums" in the song is strange and I can't
> see how it relates to Neverland either Ryan, I thought the
> whole song was based around "Beauty and the Beast"
>
I don't believe in drugs AT ALL. I also don't believe in psychopaths. In a previous life, I believe I ran a mental asylum but was killed by one of the inmates. So now in this life I'm pretty pissed off...
Everything Steinman does is "said to be" written for Neverland. "I'd do Anything for Love" isn't "Beauty and the Beast", that only depends on your interpretation, and it was also the basic plot for the music video. It's like saying "Objects" is about a helicopter crash. I never saw it that way. I saw it as a car-crash and the video spoiled the song for me.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Sex and Dru[g]s and Rock and Roll... - rockfenris2005 05:46 am UTC 04/13/07 |
| Next: |
re: Sex and Dru[g]s and Rock and Roll... - Conas 08:18 pm UTC 04/12/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|