| re: Aerosmith 'story' | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 05:49 am UTC 04/13/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Aerosmith 'story' - pidunk 11:54 pm UTC 04/12/07 |
Apparently the real reason they didn't want to go to Jim's house is because they didn't want to become part of the conspiracy because they couldn't keep anything secret. I mean, all they had to do was rock up and meet Richard O'Brien and be, like, "what the fuck?" "Yes, boys, you have to keep this dangerous conspiracy secret. Or I will lock you in the attic and force you to listen to "Total Eclipse of the Time Warp"." > > > When I signed in using my Amazon account, I found the > reference you cite and also the fact that the Kalodner > phrases are much more critical and repetitive concerning > several "stinking" blizzards that winter. All he writes of > the house invitation was that Jim wanted to work with > Steven and Joe at his own home, and that the arrangement > was not a convenient one for them to make, and they do not > say why. That it was a "bumfucking suburb"? It was a > suburb, and Kalodner apparently didn't want to go?....it's > Kalodner's words, apparently. That's got nothing really to > do with Jim in the sense that it could have been some > other reason and some other person too with the same > outcome. Why mention Jim at all? Wasted space on the page, > unless one believes that there is no such thing as bad > publicity. That's like publishing the revelation that you > decided not to have a salad before your entree at dinner > but is it the salad's fault? > > > > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Aerosmith 'story' - pidunk 11:54 pm UTC 04/12/07 |
| Next: | re: Aerosmith 'story' - RadioMaster 09:18 am UTC 04/13/07 |
| Thread: |
|