HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Aerosmith 'story'

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 05:49 am UTC 04/13/07
In reply to: re: Aerosmith 'story' - pidunk 11:54 pm UTC 04/12/07


Apparently the real reason they didn't want to go to Jim's house is because they didn't want to become part of the conspiracy because they couldn't keep anything secret. I mean, all they had to do was rock up and meet Richard O'Brien and be, like, "what the fuck?" "Yes, boys, you have to keep this dangerous conspiracy secret. Or I will lock you in the attic and force you to listen to "Total Eclipse of the Time Warp"."


> >
> When I signed in using my Amazon account, I found the
> reference you cite and also the fact that the Kalodner
> phrases are much more critical and repetitive concerning
> several "stinking" blizzards that winter. All he writes of
> the house invitation was that Jim wanted to work with
> Steven and Joe at his own home, and that the arrangement
> was not a convenient one for them to make, and they do not
> say why. That it was a "bumfucking suburb"? It was a
> suburb, and Kalodner apparently didn't want to go?....it's
> Kalodner's words, apparently. That's got nothing really to
> do with Jim in the sense that it could have been some
> other reason and some other person too with the same
> outcome. Why mention Jim at all? Wasted space on the page,
> unless one believes that there is no such thing as bad
> publicity. That's like publishing the revelation that you
> decided not to have a salad before your entree at dinner
> but is it the salad's fault?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


reply |

Previous: re: Aerosmith 'story' - pidunk 11:54 pm UTC 04/12/07
Next: re: Aerosmith 'story' - RadioMaster 09:18 am UTC 04/13/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE