| re: Imus | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 06:16 am UTC 04/14/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Imus - Wilbury 06:03 am UTC 04/14/07 |
> Haha, good. But actually I didn't give a shit that this > particular piece of American current affairs is not on my > radar and wasn't asking for an explanation (and to be > honest I basically deduced all that from the commments so > far anyway). > > Simply pointing out that to think you have to be under a > rock to not know this news,, to a guy who lives in Germany > for christs sake, is like me saying to people here they're > living under a rock cause they didn't know that south east > queensland is currently under Level 5 water resitrictions, > or who the federal Minister for Education is. > > -- G. > Of course! Actually, that was my first thought, but being as you asked something I figured that explaining it wouldn't be too off the line. You are right, that there is a high level of unrealistic perception concerning American media. I think that the internet helps to contribute to that. Every sign on screen I see on Yahoo, for example, has an article about the Imus situation on it. I haven't been listening to any of the American news myself, even whilst I be in America. And the only thing I really know of the debacle is what is being written on this board. So, I don't really care much about it either. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Imus - Pudding 06:47 am UTC 04/14/07 |
| Next: | re: Imus - Wilbury 06:36 am UTC 04/14/07 |
| Thread: | |