| re: They should conclude BAT together | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 10:26 am UTC 04/15/07 |
| In reply to: | re: They should conclude BAT together - Pudding 10:21 am UTC 04/15/07 |
> > > > but I don't feel that there is > > really such a thing as a conclusion for the concept of Bat > > Out Of Hell. Jim's works seem like living, changing, > > evolving projects which change along with us. > > Congrats, you've now booked your ticket for Ryan's theory > of Bat1 being a young man, Bat2 a middle aged man and Bat3 > for an old fart. No doubt a conclusions CD would be death, > ressurection and God. > I Won't go quietly into this goodnight Aargh! No I don't have any theories like that. Jim changes, and his music changes with him. He takes his music along with him; Bat1 is him at the age when he is considering it. Bat2 likewise. Jim isn't so locked into time like that, or in such stages. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: They should conclude BAT together - Pudding 10:21 am UTC 04/15/07 |
| Next: | According to Jim's Blog, He Will End the BAT Series HIS OWN WAY. - pidunk 11:04 am UTC 04/15/07 |
| Thread: |
|