HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: They should conclude BAT together

Posted by:
pidunk 10:26 am UTC 04/15/07
In reply to: re: They should conclude BAT together - Pudding 10:21 am UTC 04/15/07



>
>
> > but I don't feel that there is
> > really such a thing as a conclusion for the concept of Bat
> > Out Of Hell. Jim's works seem like living, changing,
> > evolving projects which change along with us.
>
> Congrats, you've now booked your ticket for Ryan's theory
> of Bat1 being a young man, Bat2 a middle aged man and Bat3
> for an old fart. No doubt a conclusions CD would be death,
> ressurection and God.
>
I Won't go quietly into this goodnight Aargh! No I don't have any theories like that. Jim changes, and his music changes with him. He takes his music along with him; Bat1 is him at the age when he is considering it. Bat2 likewise. Jim isn't so locked into time like that, or in such stages.






reply |

Previous: re: They should conclude BAT together - Pudding 10:21 am UTC 04/15/07
Next: According to Jim's Blog, He Will End the BAT Series HIS OWN WAY. - pidunk 11:04 am UTC 04/15/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE