| re: NJC: ND | |
|
Posted by: |
Markus 10:05 pm UTC 04/15/07 |
| In reply to: | re: NJC: ND - pidunk 08:18 pm UTC 04/15/07 |
| Uargh, blah blah... The funniest line is this one: "...my first impressions on this board were a bit confused..." ;-) Good night, Markus. > > > > could anyone please explain the acronym "NJC"? > > On Google, "NJC acronym" yields the result coming up first > from an internet mailing list called > href="http://www.quackquack.net/jewel/dodont.htm>"Jewel > Mailing" and this text in the instructions to their > participants of yore as this page has not been noted as > updated since November of 2000: > > Do use the NJC acronym in the beginning of > > > However, this actually has reference to the recording > artist called Jewel, as opposed to any particular internet > board, topic, termininology, etcetera. Some have > analogized it to the application of gemstones and their > worth in comparison to the worth of on-topic or off-topic > posts. But, as this quote from the same page shows, it is > just concerning the female recording artist Jewel: > > One final note on NJC. The acronym of NJC > > Concerning the use of NJC, my first impressions on this > board were a bit confused, because of the initials in > reference to the real name (please do not flog me) of our > adored Jim Steinman, and we don't even use the adapted > acronym of NJSC, which adds a letter of specificity. For > those who like to think of divine concerns, who say that > NJC is "Not Jesus Christ" I say, thump on a bible, but > leave us out of it. > > I like it when I see such things as "OT" for "Off Topic", > or "OC" for "Other Content". But, NJC does have some > limitations and history not having anything to do with > netiquette as such or the Rockman Record. > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: NJC: ND - pidunk 08:18 pm UTC 04/15/07 |
| Next: | re: NJC: ND - pidunk 10:23 pm UTC 04/15/07 |
| Thread: |
|