not logged in
| re: But Wait, There's More | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 02:16 am UTC 04/25/07 |
| In reply to: | re: But Wait, There's More - Pudding 11:54 pm UTC 04/24/07 |
> It has absolutely nothing to do with Jim Steinman, not > unless Harriet Miers is Jims GILF (Granny I'd Like to > F**k) which I doubt. > > I believe it's an attempt to either prove or disprove > information on a blog or webpage as being actual fact or > fiction, with the Harriet Miers blog being an example. > Susan believes it's true, but there's no actual evidence > to suggest that Harriet Miers actually wrote the blog > except her name is at the top. > > Pud > Okay, I've read the various posts above and don't feel like replying one post to one post, so please excuse my consolidating this here. If you re-read my posts concerning this, it is clear that I am suspension of belief as to the origin of this, and state that strong indications do lend it self to being genuine whilst it may be revealed in due time to be a prank. The question of what this has to do with Jim Steinman is irrelevant I think, because I did not start the topic, Ryan did, with a song or some mp3 continuing his "Time For Reflection" theme, that has as much relevence to Jim Steinman as perhaps this may seem to. And, the proliferation of posts NJC, such as the recent string of missives concerning the Virginia Tech Shootings should by now make everyone quite accustomed to having diversions on a less than rare basis on the board. The topic, named "Susan" is something I feel is what it is because I did not start it, but I am not straying from content as it is a topic of some significance at the time that it was posted. So, GTKarber, thank you for your one bit of input to me, I shall place on my little mental memo the proper asterisk as to your generally predisposed attitude, and move on. If you would like to show me what is parody, you can show me because I asked you to, and if you would like to shut up, you can also do that because you probably don't want to show me what is parody or do anything but make me look really dumb and naive. What's in your self esteem? Justin, I'm sorry I had the impression you had a something on blogspot but forgive me I probably got it mixed up with Ryan's. I apologize to you both for confusing either one of you at all! :-) Am I trying to prove something? Now come on, are you guys really going to let me prove something if I wanted to? I know alot better than that!!! How can I prove that this lady's blog is real, without being in an authoritative position and ring up Google and say hey chaps who is it who owns this page, would you tell me? And they would say, "would you like to have the subpeona written on blue paper or on green paper? We have a special on today." So, barring that official sort of validation, the kinds of viewing I do are those that are as limited as any, but the fact that this woman could be the key to impeaching Bush, anyone interested in foraging through the forest of data, is welcome to take a twig and pitch in. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: But Wait, There's More - Pudding 11:54 pm UTC 04/24/07 |
| Next: | Illusionists' Illusions And The Masks Some Can Wear - pidunk 12:11 am UTC 04/26/07 |
| Thread: |
|